Apr 10 2017 Topics Federalism & Separation of Powers Blog Post News Justice Thomas' Long History of Criticizing Asset Forfeiture Nick Sibilla Alongside Sen. Rand Paul, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has become one of the most...
Nov 1 2021 Publication State Court Docket Watch State Court Docket Watch: State of Indiana v. Tyson Timbs Jeremiah Grant Mosteller An Eight-Year Battle The Indiana Supreme Court has considered the state’s use of civil asset...
Nov 27 2018 Topics Criminal Law & Procedure • Supreme Court Blog Post News Docket Watch: Timbs v. Indiana Darpana Sheth Nunziata Tomorrow [November 28, 2018], the U.S. Supreme Court hears argument in Timbs v. Indiana. A...
Mar 24 2022 Publication Federalist Society Review Principles of State Constitutional Interpretation Clint Bolick Federalist Society Review, Volume 23 State constitutionalism—the practice of state courts deciding cases on independent state constitutional grounds—is a vital...
Dec 16 2022 Publication State Court Docket Watch State Court Docket Watch: Ohio v. O'Malley Anthony Sanders Ohio Supreme Court refuses to adopt a standard for addressing excessive fines claims. In 2019, in Timbs v. Indiana, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that the Excessive Fines...
May 27 2023 Topics Supreme Court • Environmental Law & Property Rights Blog Post Major Unanimous Supreme Court Victory for Property Rights in Tyler v. Hennepin County Ilya Somin This post was originally published at the Volokh Conspiracy. [Thursday] morning, the Supreme Court issued...
Dec 1 1997 Publication Forfeiture Reform Stefan D. Cassella Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 3, Fall 1997 The Justice Department has drafted and sent to Congress a set of legislative proposals to...
May 1 1997 Publication Forfeiture is Reasonable, and It Works Stefan D. Cassella Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2, Spring 1997 Asset forfeiture has become one of the most powerful and important tools that federal law...
Dec 1 1996 Publication Supreme Court Rules That Civil Forfeiture is not Punishment for Double Jeopardy Purposes Larry D. Thompson Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 1, Fall 1996 In United States v. Ursery, 116 S.Ct. 2135 (1996), the United States Supreme Court held...
Topics
Justice Thomas' Long History of Criticizing Asset Forfeiture
Alongside Sen. Rand Paul, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has become one of the most...
State Court Docket Watch: State of Indiana v. Tyson Timbs
Jeremiah Grant Mosteller
An Eight-Year Battle The Indiana Supreme Court has considered the state’s use of civil asset...
Topics
Docket Watch: Timbs v. Indiana
Tomorrow [November 28, 2018], the U.S. Supreme Court hears argument in Timbs v. Indiana. A...
Principles of State Constitutional Interpretation
Clint Bolick
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
State constitutionalism—the practice of state courts deciding cases on independent state constitutional grounds—is a vital...
State Court Docket Watch: Ohio v. O'Malley
Anthony Sanders
Ohio Supreme Court refuses to adopt a standard for addressing excessive fines claims.
In 2019, in Timbs v. Indiana, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that the Excessive Fines...
Topics
Major Unanimous Supreme Court Victory for Property Rights in Tyler v. Hennepin County
This post was originally published at the Volokh Conspiracy. [Thursday] morning, the Supreme Court issued...
Forfeiture Reform
Stefan D. Cassella
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 3, Fall 1997
The Justice Department has drafted and sent to Congress a set of legislative proposals to...
Forfeiture is Reasonable, and It Works
Stefan D. Cassella
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2, Spring 1997
Asset forfeiture has become one of the most powerful and important tools that federal law...
Supreme Court Rules That Civil Forfeiture is not Punishment for Double Jeopardy Purposes
Larry D. Thompson
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 1, Fall 1996
In United States v. Ursery, 116 S.Ct. 2135 (1996), the United States Supreme Court held...