Her client experience in competition and antitrust is wide-scale and includes class action litigation, trade secret disputes, and defending clients in government investigations, grand jury subpoenas, and other proceedings. Lindsey enjoys working with her clients and with a variety of industry groups to help train their professionals regarding antitrust developments such as enforcement in critical areas, including procurement and labor. She is a thought leader regarding the evolution of criminal antitrust prosecution of no-poach agreements, and regularly trains and advises companies that do business with the government regarding increased risks from DOJ’s nascent Procurement Collusion Strike Force. Lindsey also works with clients as they assess competition concerns regarding potential business collaborations, such as teaming agreements and joint ventures.
In addition to representing defendants in cartel investigations and civil litigation, Lindsey also works with clients to prosecute and remedy antitrust harms they may incur. She currently represents 12 large shipping companies asserting claims against four Class I railroad companies in the In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation. The V&E team has a leading role in spearheading the multi-district litigation and organizing strategy and discovery efforts across more than 300 plaintiffs.
A national thought leader, Lindsey co-chairs the ABA Antitrust Section’s Cartel & Criminal Practice Committee She often speaks on competition and has authored numerous articles deciphering the newest developments in antitrust enforcement to report on the potential implications.
She has been repeatedly recognized by Global Competition Review’s Who’s Who Legal as a rising star and future leader in Competition.
Lindsey maintains an active pro bono docket, which has included leading roles in several litigation matters, including advocating on behalf of the mother of a minor child in contested custody dispute in D.C. Superior Court, co-chairing a jury trial in a disability discrimination case brought in federal court in the District of Columbia, and leading an evidentiary hearing related to a Section 2255 petition in the Eastern District of Virginia. She regularly supervises V&E teams in cases involving housing conditions, landlord/tenant issues, and asylum.
The Case for RESTORE? Injunctions, Patents, and the Future of Innovation
Ryan T. Holte, Andrei Iancu, Adam Mossoff, Kristen Osenga, Chris Storm
Join the Federalist Society for a timely and compelling discussion on the RESTORE Act, legislation...
Prosecution Laches: No Good Deed Goes Unpunished!
Jeffrey E. Depp, Joseph Matal, Paul Redmond Michel, Gene Quinn
Prosecution laches is an infrequently used equitable doctrine that bars enforcement of a patent when...
Patent Owners in the Soup... No Injunction for You!
Jonathan Barnett, Thomas F. Cotter, Jeffrey E. Depp, Paul Redmond Michel
Some Intellectual Property experts contend that American patent reliability has been in decline for 20...
A Discussion of Labor Law: Is the Taft-Hartley Act Being Interpreted as Written?
Fred B. Jacob, John F. Ring
The 1947 Taft-Hartley amendments to the National Labor Relations Act, doggedly opposed by organized labor,...
The Injunction Function: Is IP Law Promoting Markets for Innovators and Creators?
John W. Holcomb, Ryan T. Holte, Kristen Osenga, Laurie Self, Laura Sheridan
In patent and copyright law, injunctions are now a subject of significant policy debate. Innovators...
Topics
Is Crypto Insider Trading Really “Insider Trading”?: Prosecuting Fraud in the Crypto Space
Cryptocurrency conjures images of both the Wild West and the Wolf of Wall Street. Crypto...
Criminal Market Allocation or Pro-Competitive Agreement: The Debate over DOJ’s “No Poach” Prosecutions
R. Pepper Crutcher, Bernard A. Nigro, G. Zachary Terwilliger, Lindsey Vaala
No poaching allowed! No, you have not wandered into a Hunter’s Safety Forum, but rather...
The Injunction Presumption: Revisiting eBay v. MercExchange
David Jones, Paul Redmond Michel, Adam Mossoff, Robert J. Rando
The Federalist Society's Intellectual Property Practice Group is pleased to host this panel discussion on...
The Deterioration of Appropriate Remedies in Patent Disputes
Geoffrey A. Manne, Kristian Stout, Julian Morris, Dirk Auer
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Deep Dive Episode 123 – Antitrust Investigations into Big Tech Companies
Thomas Hazlett, Jennifer Huddleston, Hal Singer
American tech companies like Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon are some of the most successful...