Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Why Congress
Panel: The Future of Student Loan Cancellation, State Standing, and the Major Questions Doctrine after Biden v. Nebraska
Washington, DCChevron Deference feat. Prof. Christopher Walker
Memphis Lawyers Chapter
Do States Enjoy a Special Solicitude?
2023 National Lawyers Convention
Washington, DCLoper Bright and the Next Steps for Chevron Deference at the Supreme Court
What is the Future of Textualism?
TeleforumThe Major Questions Doctrine, Chevron Deference & the Future of the Regulatory State
Richmond Student Chapter
Richmond, VALuncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation
24th Annual Federalist Society Faculty Conference
San Diego, CA24th Annual Federalist Society Faculty Conference
San Diego, CAWest Virginia v. EPA: The Supreme Court, the Major Questions Doctrine, and the Future of the Regulatory State
Salt Lake City Lawyers Chapter
Salt Lake City, UT