Originalism and Determining Meaning

Originalism and Determining Meaning

 

Originalism is a theory of Constitutional interpretation that places primacy on the meaning of the text of the Constitution - yet the question of determining how much can be understood from the Constitution is debated among Originalists. Some Originalists think that the text only provides a narrow or ambiguous meaning, leaving room for significant construction of meaning to fill in the gaps. Other Originalists argue that the text itself supplies more explicit meaning, leaving less room or need for construction. This unit in the No. 86 project explores different views in this debate about the "construction zone." 

Play the next video in the series?

Watch Now

4 of 11: Evidence for the Original Public Meaning of “Officer” [No. 86]

Who was considered an “Officer of the United States” when the Constitution was ratified? Professor Jennifer Mascott shares the results of her study of original documents that use the term “officer.” In the early years of Congress, any offic ... Who was considered an “Officer of the United States” when the Constitution was ratified?

Professor Jennifer Mascott shares the results of her study of original documents that use the term “officer.” In the early years of Congress, any official who performed ongoing government duties was considered to be an officer and, thus, subject to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.

Jennifer Mascott is an Assistant Professor of Law at the Antonin Scalia Law School. Professor Mascott writes in the areas of administrative and constitutional law.

* * * * *

As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

These videos were filmed when Jennifer Mascott was a professor at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School. Her views are entirely her own.

Subscribe to the series’ playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWwcngsYgoUXu97xPQ7LdAJ0Oh7I7w-Dt