Courthouse Steps: Two Cases - Matal v Tam and Packingham v North Carolina

Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Teleforum

The Court has ruled today in two important cases, Matal v. Tam (aka "The Slants" copyright case) and Packingham v. North Carolina, which concerns a North Carolina law that restricts the access of convicted sex offenders to “commercial social networking” websites.  Join us for this special Teleforum at which the holdings and reasoning of both cases will be discussed.  

Featuring:

• Mr. Michael R. Huston, Associate Attorney, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
• Mr. Ilya Shapiro,  Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute

The Court has ruled today in two important cases, Matal v. Tam (aka "The Slants" copyright case) and Packingham v. North Carolina, which concerns a North Carolina law that restricts the access of convicted sex offenders to “commercial social networking” websites.  Join us for this special Teleforum at which the holdings and reasoning of both cases will be discussed.  

Featuring:

• Mr. Michael R. Huston, Associate Attorney, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
• Mr. Ilya Shapiro,  Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute

Call begins at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.