Todd Gaziano is the President of the Center for Individual Rights. Mr. Gaziano received his J.D. in 1988 from the University of Chicago Law School, where he was a John M. Olin Fellow in Law and Economics. He received his B.A. from West Virginia University, summa cum laude in 1985. He was selected as a Truman Scholar from West Virginia while an undergraduate.
Mr. Gaziano’s previous legal work includes service as a law clerk for U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Judge Edith Jones, as an attorney in the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel, as a chief subcommittee counsel in the U.S. House of Representatives, as a Houston trial attorney, and as a chief corporate legal officer. He also served a six-year term as commissioner on the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (2008-2013), where he helped conduct oversight and investigations of civil rights agencies.
For most of the last 25 years, Mr. Gaziano was a legal scholar and public interest law leader, promoting individual liberty in the Supreme Court and Congress. From 1997 to 2013, he was the founding director of the Edwin Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation. From 2014 until he joined CIR, he was the Chief of Legal Policy and Strategic Research, and Director of the Center for the Separation of Powers, at Pacific Legal Foundation.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
The Implications of the Latest Congressional Review Act Disapprovals
Administrative Law & Regulation Practice Group Teleforum
TeleforumWill the Courts Take Congressional Delegations of Power to Regulatory Agencies Seriously?
California-Davis Student Chapter
Zoom Webinar -- University of California DavisVirtual
Davis, CA 95616
Administrative State After Gundy & Kisor
Columbia Student Chapter
Columbia Law School435 W 116th St
New York, NY 10027
Litigation to Overturn the Administrative State: How Seeming “Losses” in Gundy and Kisor Will Help:
George Washington Student Chapter
The George Washington University Law School2000 H Street NW
Washington, DC 20052
Deep Dive Episode 190 – The Implications of the Latest Congressional Review Act Disapprovals
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast
The Congressional Review Act (CRA) was used in 2017 to overturn 15 rules issued near...
The Implications of the Latest Congressional Review Act Disapprovals
Administrative Law & Regulation Practice Group Teleforum
The Congressional Review Act (CRA) was used in 2017 to overturn 15 rules issued near...
The Implications of the Latest Congressional Review Act Disapprovals
Administrative Law & Regulation Practice Group Teleforum
The Congressional Review Act (CRA) was used in 2017 to overturn 15 rules issued near...
Necessary & Proper Episode 62: Congressional Review Act: First Branch Gets the Last Word
After living in relative obscurity since its passage in 1996, the Congressional Review Act caught...
Deep Dive Episode 161 – Congressional Review Act: First Branch Gets the Last Word
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast
After living in relative obscurity since its passage in 1996, the Congressional Review Act caught...