Reva Siegel is the Nicholas deB. Katzenbach Professor of Law at Yale University. Professor Siegel’s writing draws on legal history to explore questions of law and inequality, and to analyze how courts interact with representative government and popular movements in interpreting the Constitution. She is currently writing on the role of social movement conflict in guiding constitutional change, addressing this question in recent articles on the enforcement of Brown, originalism and the Second Amendment, the "de facto ERA," and reproductive rights. Her publications include Before Roe v. Wade: Voices That Shaped the Abortion Debate Before the Supreme Court’s Ruling, (with Linda Greenhouse, 2nd ed. 2012); The Constitution in 2020 (edited with Jack Balkin, 2009);Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking (with Brest, Levinson, Balkin & Amar, 2006) and Directions in Sexual Harassment Law (edited with Catharine A. MacKinnon, 2004). Professor Siegel received her B.A., M.Phil, and J.D. from Yale University, clerked for Judge Spottswood Robinson on the D.C. Circuit, and began teaching at the University of California at Berkeley. She is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and is active in the American Society for Legal History, the American Association of Law Schools, and the American Constitution Society, serving on the board of the national organization and as faculty advisor of Yale’s chapter.
- Yale Law School, J.D.
- Yale University, M.Phil. in American Studies
- Yale College, B.A.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
Panel: Dobbs & the Rule of Law
24th Annual Federalist Society Faculty Conference
Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina333 W Harbor Dr
San Diego, CA 92101
Civil Rights: Use of Disparate Impact Analysis
2013 National Lawyers Convention
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Panel IV: Tradition and the People's Constitution
2008 Annual Student Symposium
University of Michigan Law School625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Panel: Dobbs & the Rule of Law
24th Annual Federalist Society Faculty Conference
This past June, the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization...
Civil Rights: Use of Disparate Impact Analysis
2013 National Lawyers Convention
A number of commentators have noted an expansion of the use of disparate impact analysis...
Civil Rights: Use of Disparate Impact Analysis
2013 National Lawyers Convention
A number of commentators have noted an expansion of the use of disparate impact analysis...
Panel IV: Tradition and the People's Constitution
2008 Annual Student Symposium
The Federalist Society's Student Division presented this panel at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium on...
Panel IV: Tradition and the People's Constitution
2008 Annual Student Symposium
The Federalist Society's Student Division presented this panel at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium on...