Professor Young teaches constitutional law, federal courts, and foreign relations law. He is one of the nation's leading authorities on the constitutional law of federalism, having written extensively on the Rehnquist Court's "Federalist Revival" and the difficulties confronting courts as they seek to draw lines between national and state authority. He also is an active commentator on foreign relations law, where he focuses on the interaction between domestic and supranational courts and the application of international law by domestic courts. Professor Young also writes on constitutional interpretation and constitutional theory. He has been known to dabble in maritime law and comparative constitutional law.
A native of Abilene, Texas, Professor Young joined the Duke Law faculty in 2008, after serving as the Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law, where he had taught since 1999. He graduated from Dartmouth College in 1990 and Harvard Law School in 1993. After law school, he served as a law clerk to Judge Michael Boudin of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (1993-94) and to Justice David Souter of the U.S. Supreme Court (1995-96). Professor Young practiced law at Cohan, Simpson, Cowlishaw, & Wulff in Dallas, Texas (1994-95) and at Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C. (1996-98), where he specialized in appellate litigation. He has also been a visiting professor at Harvard Law School (2004-05) and Villanova University School of Law (1998-99), as well as an adjunct professor at Georgetown University Law Center (1997).
Elected to the American Law Institute in 2006, Professor Young is an active participant in both public and private litigation in his areas of interest. He has been the principal author of amicus briefs on behalf of leading constitutional scholars in several recent Supreme Court cases, including Medellin v. Texas(concerning presidential power and the authority of the International Court of Justice over domestic courts) and Gonzales v. Raich (concerning federal power to regulate medical marijuana).
Was Erie Correctly Decided?
Duke Student Chapter
Zoom Webinar -- Duke210 Science Drive
Durham, NC 27708
Judicial Engagement vs. Judicial Restraint
Duke Student Chapter
Zoom Webinar -- Duke210 Science Drive
Durham, NC 27708
Courthouse Steps Decision Teleforum: Allen v. Cooper
Intellectual Property Practice Group Teleforum
Teleforum
Sanctuary Cities and Federalism
Duke Student Chapter
Duke University School of Law210 Science Dr.
Durham, NC 27708
Allen v. Cooper - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
On March 23, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court released a decision in Allen v. Cooper,...
Courthouse Steps Decision Teleforum: Allen v. Cooper
Intellectual Property Practice Group Teleforum
Of Federalism, Copyright, and Blackbeard’s Revenge: The recent Supreme Court ruling in Allen v. Cooper is the latest...
Litigation and Regulatory Reform
Sixth Annual Executive Branch Review Conference
The Sixth Annual Executive Branch Review Conference is scheduled for Tuesday, April 17 at the...
Litigation and Regulatory Reform
Sixth Annual Executive Branch Review Conference
The Sixth Annual Executive Branch Review Conference is scheduled for Tuesday, April 17 at the...
Panel Three: Federalism as a Check on Executive Authority
2017 Annual Texas Chapters Conference
EPA regulatory power, voting rights and redistricting, federal directives regarding transgender persons, the constitutionality of...