Adam Biegel is co-chair of Alston & Bird’s Litigation & Trial Practice Group and former co-chair of its Antitrust Team. He has substantial experience representing clients on antitrust counseling and litigation matters, including those involving government and internal investigations, mergers and joint ventures, pricing and distribution, compliance counseling and training, pre-merger reviews under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act, and multidistrict litigation. He regularly represents clients before the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division, Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and state attorneys general, and in federal courts.
Adam is recognized for his antitrust experience by Chambers USA and selected to The Best Lawyers in America®, including his recognition as “Lawyer of the Year” for Antitrust Litigation in Washington, D.C., in 2022. He is a longtime member of the American Bar Association Antitrust Law Section’s leadership, currently serving as co-chair of its In-House Counsel Task Force and previously having served on its board, and chaired its Corporate Counseling Committee, Long Range Planning Committee, and Spring Meeting conference. He also serves on the board of the Federalist Society’s antitrust practice group.
Adam served as a law clerk to the Hon. Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Before attending law school, he worked as a newspaper reporter in Arkansas and on the legislative staff of U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
Courthouse Steps: What Does the Supreme Court’s Decision in Apple v. Pepper Mean for Antitrust Law and the U.S. Economy?
Corporations, Antitrust, and Securities Practice Group Teleforum
TeleforumTime for a Checkup: Evaluating the Withdrawal of the Health Care Antitrust Guidelines
In 1996, the FTC and DOJ issued Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care. ...
Time for a Checkup: Evaluating the Withdrawal of the Health Care Antitrust Guidelines
In 1996, the FTC and DOJ issued Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care. ...
FTC Chair Halts Expedited Antitrust Clearance for Deals, Calls for Higher Filing Fees for Large Deals
The new Acting Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) took actions last week that may...
Courthouse Steps: What Does the Supreme Court’s Decision in Apple v. Pepper Mean for Antitrust Law and the U.S. Economy?
Corporations, Antitrust, and Securities Practice Group Teleforum
On May 13, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that Apple may face antitrust...
Antitrust Enforcement by State Attorney Generals
State Attorneys General often investigate antitrust violations – ranging from price fixing to anticompetitive mergers...