1127 Connecticut Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
Registration is now CLOSED
Rapid innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) have raised unprecedented legal and ethical questions. The development of AI-related technologies and capacities calls for a robust discussion of the varying issues, challenges, opportunities, and potential responses. The Federalist Society seeks to promote research and conversations addressing the legal implications of AI, emphasizing the preservation of our foundational values, the primacy of mankind, individual rights, and the rule of law.
We are proud to announce a new symposium on the legal and regulatory landscape of AI. We have invited submissions from lawyers, scholars, policymakers, and other experts on the myriad issues surrounding AI and the law grounded in conservative legal principles.
The Editorial Committee will select eight winners and eight runners-up from across the topic categories. Winners will be presenting their papers at the Symposium.
In-person attendees may obtain 255 minutes of CLE credit at no cost.
Paper Topics Confirmed to Date:
Speakers Confirmed to Date:
Conference Schedule:
We eagerly anticipate a robust exchange of ideas, grounded in our shared commitment to the principles that have guided our nation since its founding. As AI continues to evolve, it is crucial for Conservative voices grounded in our founding principles to be at the forefront of these discussions, ensuring that our values and legal traditions are preserved for future generations.
Back to topThe Future of Law in an AI World
Featuring
The Future of Law in an AI World
The panel will focus on Ryan Bangert and Jeremy Tedesco’s paper, “The Ghost in the Machine: How Generative AI Will Test the Bounds of the First Amendment” which examines generative AI, the NetChoice decision, and the future of First Amendment parameters in an AI era.
Panel 1 will also discuss Bartlett Cleland and Andy Craig’s work, “Protecting Election Integrity From A.I. by Defining Impermissible Uses Rather Than Impermissible Technology.” The article argues that in the context of election integrity it is wiser to focus on constraint of bad AI uses rather than attempting to define and regulate ever-changing technologies by legal terms.
Featuring:
The Future of Law in an AI World
The Future of Law in an AI World
This panel will look at Roger Alford’s article, “The Competitive Landscape of Generative Artificial Intelligence” which explores the upstream and downstream aspects of generative AI, salient antitrust concerns, and the relationship of competition and national security.
The panel will also examine Zvi Rosen’s piece, “Copyright’s Repetition on Generative Works” and review the original purposes and what the history of copyright registration might portend for the emerging issues presented by modern generative AI.
Featuring:
The Future of Law in an AI World
Featuring:
The Future of Law in an AI World
Panel 3 will tackle Anastasia Boden and Brent Skorup’s paper, “Welcoming Our AI Overlords and Improving Americans’ Access to Justice” and discuss how AI could bridge the gap between litigants and accessible legal services, and the regulatory hurdles that could hinder potential benefits.
Panel 3 will focus on Kevin Frazier’s work, “AI Deference” which contemplates the prospect of a new world where AI drives the substance of federal agency action
Featuring:
The Future of Law in an AI World
This panel will discuss James Cooper and Evangelos Razis’s piece, “The Federalist’s Dilemma: State AI Regulation & Pathways Forward” and look at the horizontal patchwork of state efforts and potential vertical federal regulation of AI.
The panel will review Sarah Hunt’s piece, “Artificial Intelligence and Critical Minerals: Addressing the National Security Imperative for
Permitting Reform in a Post-Chevron World” and explore AI as it adapts to manage modern national security threats and global
competition.
Featuring:
The Future of Law in an AI World