Trump v. Mazars USA and Trump v. Vance - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
featuring Devin Watkins
| Topics: | Supreme Court • Federalism & Separation of Powers |
|---|
Three cases before the Supreme Court consider the ability of grand juries and congressional committees to subpoena the personal tax records of the President. In Trump v. Mazars USA and Trump v. Deutsche Bank, three House committees subpoenaed the President’s tax records. In Trump v. Vance, a local grand jury has subpoenaed these tax documents as well. There are several issues at play in determining if these subpoenas are valid.
The Supreme Court has also asked the parties to brief whether these congressional subpoenas are the kind of dispute between the branches that the court should avoid.
To discuss the case, we have Devin Watkins, Attorney at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.