Listen & Download

On Wednesday, March 27th, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kisor v. Wilkie.  The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Kisor to decide whether to overrule Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410 (1945), and Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997).  Seminole Rock and Auer are often cited for the proposition that when an administrative agency promulgates a regulation and the regulation is ambiguous, a reviewing court must give “controlling weight” to the agency’s interpretation of the regulation unless the interpretation is plainly erroneous or is inconsistent with the regulation.  A number of the Court’s members have cast doubt on the soundness of the Seminole Rock/Auer deference doctrine in recent years.  Many observers believe that the doctrine’s days are numbered. 

 

Featuring: 

Karen Harned, Executive Director, NFIB Small Business Legal Center

Andrew Varcoe, Partner, Boyden Gray & Associates

Moderator: Stephen Vaden, General Counsel, United States Department of Agriculture