Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at [email protected].
Topics
Texas Tech Abandons Racial Preferences in Medical School Admissions
Texas Tech’s medical school recently agreed to stop using racial and ethnic preferences in its...
Topics
Examining the California Consumer Privacy Act
In this teleforum, our experts, Professor Eric Goldman, Lindsey Tonsager, and moderator Professor Gus Hurwitz...
Topics
The Equality Act’s Threat to Religious Liberty
As Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi leads House Democrats closer to passage of the...
Topics
Why New Hampshire Should Not Adopt ABA Model Rule 8.4(g)
The New Hampshire Supreme Court is holding a public comment period through April 11, 2019, on a...
Topics
D.C. Bar Taking Comments on its Version of ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) until Close of Business Today
The D.C. Bar Rules of Professional Responsibility Review Committee is holding a public comment period...
Topics
Fed 'Independence' is a Slippery Slope
Many observers, like Captain Renault in "Casablanca," were “shocked, shocked!” at President Trump’s sharp criticism...
Topics
American Justice 2018: Book Review
“The Shifting Supreme Court” is the latest from the University of Pennsylvania’s “American Justice” series,...
Topics
Rule of Law Is Not Rule of Lawyers
Over the last several months, as the leadership of the House of Representatives and its...
Topics
Beck Employee Rights Likely to be Strengthened and Revitalized
For much of the past 10 years private sector employees faced a standstill in enforcing...
Topics
Fireside Chat with FTC Commissioner Christine Wilson
Earlier this month, the Federalist Society’s Telecommunications & Electronic Media Practice Group and Corporations, Securities...