The Gig is Up?
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at [email protected].
Raise your hand if you took a ride with Uber or Lyft this week. Now ask someone who is not able to drive a car how much they rely on these services. Americans love the convenience which app-based workers provide; we also love the prices, which seem very reasonable.
Now raise your hand if you drive for one of the Transportation Network Companies or Delivery Network Companies. The workers who perform these “gigs” also report a high degree of satisfaction with their work – “I’m my own boss!” “I work when I want, and don’t work when I don’t want.”
Finally, raise your hand if you are a small business owner who doesn’t have the resources to maintain a throng of W-2 employees, but needs a much more nimble, flexible and “on demand” workforce. Business owners have come to rely on independent contractors to fill in the gaps when customer demand is high.
So, workers, consumers and businesses love the gig economy. Sadly, just because an idea is good, does not mean that it will be embraced by policy makers in our federal, state and local governments. Much criticism has been leveled at this business model, primarily focusing on the alleged exploitation of workers and adverse impact on tax revenue.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently published a comprehensive report on the gig economy, authored by my Partner, Tammy McCutcheon, and a superstar Associate Attorney with our firm, Alex MacDonald. The report explores the depths of the gig economy, including a romp through the history of contractor law, a detailed definition of exactly what the gig economy entails, and an analysis of criticisms of the gig economy. The report also delves into current government regulation of this sector of our economy, and the threats those regulations pose to the entire gig model. Finally, the report evaluates various options for a more balanced and realistic approach to addressing the potential challenges presented by this new business model.
Two things are certain – the gig economy is here to stay, and government efforts to regulate this growing sector of our society, our workplaces, and our daily lives will continue to expand. The Chamber’s Report provides a roadmap for addressing the important issues which are presented by the gig economy.
* * *
Bruce Sarchet is a shareholder with Littler, a member of the firm’s Workplace Policy Institute, and a resource on California’s new independent contractor law, AB 5.
Shareholder, Littler Mendelson P.C.
Bruce J. Sarchet has focused his entire legal career on the representation of management in labor and employment law matters and has particular expertise in issues involving:
He regularly appears in state and federal courts and before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on matters involving:
With energy, enthusiasm, and intense focus, Bruce provides clients with superior quality work and exceptional client service and has earned a reputation as a hands-on problem solver. He provides consultation and representation to large, medium and small businesses across California in a variety of industries, including food and beverage, healthcare, transportation, technology, and construction. He also represents public sector employers. He crafts practical, real world solutions to workplace problems such as dealing with difficult employees and recognizing and balancing business realities and necessities with the need to minimize exposure to litigation.
For unionized employers, Bruce frequently serves as chief spokesperson in collective bargaining negotiations and provides representation in grievances and arbitration hearings. He also represents employers during union organizing drives and unfair labor practice charges under the National Labor Relations Act.
An animated, effective and entertaining public speaker, Bruce regularly makes presentations to local professional organizations on labor and employment law topics and has also presented numerous in-house training sessions and workshops to management teams at private and public employers. Bruce has published numerous articles for local business journals, providing practical, hands-on labor and employment law advice to small business owners.
From 2005 to 2013, Bruce served on the firm's five-attorney Management Committee, which handles the firm's operations. In this capacity, he oversaw thirteen Littler offices in seven states. Prior to his selection to the Management Committee, he served as the office-managing shareholder for the firm's Sacramento office and served several terms as a member of the firm's Board of Directors.