Rethinking How We Deal with Campus Sexual Assault
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at info@fedsoc.org.
Today, crimes of sexual violence on campus are not always reported to law enforcement. Schools are tasked with investigating and judging felony allegations in proceedings that lack the power and resources of proper authorities. Schools cannot subpoena witnesses, take testimony under oath, or collect and review forensic evidence—nor should they. A lack of due process undermines the integrity of the proceedings and increases the likelihood of errors that can harm students for the rest of their lives.
Several recent incidents of actual or alleged campus sexual assault have received national media attention. Less has been reported about the failures and injustices of the current process for investigating and adjudicating sexual assault on campus.
The failures of the current system have allowed dangerous criminals to commit horrific crimes, as in the case of Jesse Matthew, who received three life sentences last week and awaits trial for the murder of UVA student Hannah Graham. The Rolling Stone debacle at the University of Virginia led to a suspension of activities for dozens of student groups and thousands of students who had nothing to do with the underlying allegations of sexual violence.
Senator Trent Lott and I penned an op-ed in the Washington Post yesterday in support of the Safe Campus Act. This bill would make sure law enforcement takes the lead in investigating sexual assault allegations and would provide due process protections to students and student organizations, including right to counsel and the right to appeal school findings. Legislation like this is a first step to addressing the injustices and failures of the current system.
Partner (retd.), Foley & Lardner LLP
Cleta Mitchell was a partner and political law attorney in the Washington, D.C. office of Foley & Lardner LLP and a member of the firm’s Political Law Practice. With more than 40 years of experience in law, politics and public policy, Ms. Mitchell advised nonprofit and issue organizations, corporations, candidates, campaigns, and individuals on state and federal campaign finance law, election law, and compliance issues related to lobbying, ethics and financial disclosure. Ms. Mitchell practiced before the Federal Election Commission, the ethics committees of the US House and Senate and similar state and local enforcement bodies and agencies.
Ms. Mitchell has extensive experience on the federal lobbying and ethics law enacted by Congress in 2007, having taught dozens of seminars on the subject since its passage. In 2008, Ms. Mitchell authored The Lobbying Compliance Handbook, published by Columbia Books, Inc.
Ms. Mitchell represented numerous candidates, campaigns and members of Congress, as well as state and national political party committees. She has served as legal counsel to the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee. Ms. Mitchell served as co-counsel for the National Rifle Association in the Supreme Court case involving the 2002 federal campaign finance law.
Ms. Mitchell has testified before Congress on numerous occasions related to election law, campaign finance and lobbying and ethics laws, and is a frequent speaker and guest commentator on political law. In 1999, she authored "The Rise of America’s Two National Pastimes: Baseball and the Law," published by the University of Michigan Law Review, and in 2012, Ms. Mitchell authored “Donor Disclosure: Undermining The First Amendment,” published by the Minnesota Law Review. In 2013, she was interviewed by The Wall Street Journal, “How to Investigate the IRS.”
Ms. Mitchell served on the advisory council to the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Election Law and as an advisor on the American Law Institute's Election Law Project entitled, “Principles of Election Law: Dispute Resolution.” She serves on the board of directors of the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, is chairman of the American Conservative Union Foundation, and has served as the president of the Republican National Lawyers Association.
Ms. Mitchell was a member of the Oklahoma House of Representatives from 1976-1984 where she chaired the House Appropriations and Budget Committee. She served on the executive committee of the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Ms. Mitchell was in private law practice in Oklahoma City in litigation and administrative law until 1991 when she became director and general counsel of the Term Limits Legal Institute in Washington, D.C. She litigated cases in state and federal courts nationwide on congressional term limits and served as co-counsel with former U.S. Attorney General Griffin Bell in the Supreme Court of the United States case on term limits for members of Congress.
Ms. Mitchell earned both her B.A., magna cum laude, and J.D. from the University of Oklahoma.