Money and the Constitution
Part I – The Federal Government’s Issuance of Currency and Coins
Part I – The Federal Government’s Issuance of Currency and Coins
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at [email protected].
At this year’s National Lawyers Convention, in November, the Federalist Society’s Financial Services and E-Commerce Practice Group is sponsoring a panel discussion on Money and the Constitution. It is a broad topic, but a very important, foundational one. In preparation for that discussion, I am offering, as a member of the practice group, what I see as some basic, key points that need to be understood. These points will surely raise questions, which is my hope.
Since Section 8 of Article I of the Constitution granted Congress the power "to borrow Money on the credit of the United States," and since Federal Reserve notes held by the public effectively represent credit extended to the federal government, through the Federal Reserve, by the holders of those notes, the Federal Reserve's issuance and redemption of Federal Reserve notes appears to be constitutionally permissible.
Although called a Federal Reserve Note, individual pieces of U.S. currency effectively are non-interest-bearing bearer bonds of no fixed maturity. Because the Federal Reserve System, a federal entity, issues Federal Reserve Notes, they clearly are debt obligations of the federal government. Further, these "notes" can be exchanged, without restriction and at par, or face value, through commercial banks, for interest-bearing Treasury debt.
Coins issued by the Treasury Department can readily be exchanged at par for Federal Reserve notes or for interest-bearing Treasury debt. Therefore, from a constitutional perspective, no distinction needs to be drawn between U.S. coins and Federal Reserve notes.
The quantity of Federal Reserve notes and U.S. coins in circulation – both domestically and outside the United States – is totally demand-driven; that is, no one is forced to hold Federal Reserve Notes or U.S. coins or barred from exchanging those notes and coins for interest-bearing Treasury debt. Consequently, there cannot be an overissuance of U.S. currency (Federal Reserve notes plus coins issued the U.S. Treasury). Overissuance of currency is the usual cause of high rates of inflation in other countries, such as is occurring at this time in Venezuela.
Because the federal government some time ago voluntarily ceased paying any of its obligations in coin and currency, today it lacks the mechanisms to force currency into circulation. Countries with runaway inflation pay many of their obligations in non-redeemable currency instead of by checks or electronic funds transfers that can be put back, at par, to the government by financial intermediaries.
Principal, Ely & Company, Inc.
Bert Ely has specialized in deposit insurance and banking structure issues since 1981. In 1986, he became an early predictor of the S&L crisis and a taxpayer bailout of the FSLIC. In 1991, he was the first person to correctly predict the non-crisis in commercial banking; in 1992, he predicted an eventual taxpayer bailout of the Japanese banking system.
Bert continuously monitors conditions in the banking and S&L industries, monetary policy, and the growing federalization of credit risk. He has helped to draft legislation to enact the cross-guarantee concept for privatizing banking regulation and its related deposit insurance and systemic risks. He has testified on numerous occasions before congressional committees on banking issues and he often speaks on these matters to bankers and others.
Bert first established his consulting practice in 1972. Before that, he was the chief financial officer of a public company, a consultant with Touche, Ross & Company, and an auditor with Ernst & Ernst. He received his MBA from the Harvard Business School in 1968 and his Bachelor's degree in economics in 1964 from Case Western Reserve University.