Facts of the Case
Roger C. Redhail, a Wisconsin minor, fathered a child. A court ordered him to pay child support. Two years later, he applied for a marriage license in Milwaukee County. His application was denied by County Clerk Thomas E. Zablocki who declined to issue the license under a state statute on the ground that Redhail owed more than $3,700 in child support.. Redhail filed a class action in federal district court against Zablocki and all Wisconsin county clerks. The court ruled in Redhail's favor. Zablocki appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Questions
Did the Wisconsin statute violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Conclusions
-
Yes. In an 8-1 decision, the Court held that Wisconsin's statute violated the Equal Protection Clause and reaffirmed that marriage was a fundamental right. In the majority opinion authored by Justice Thurgood Marshall, the Court emphasized marriage as part of the right to privacy found in the Fourteenth Amendment as identified in Griswold v. Connecticut. While the state has an interest in ensuring that child support obligations were fulfilled, this statute only regulated those who wished to be married and did not justify the restriction on the right to marriage as found in Loving v. Virginia.
The ABA and United States v. Windsor
ABA Watch August 2013
Since 2004, the American Bar Association has formally opposed federal actions that ban or limit...
Perry v. Schwarzenegger: Is Traditional Marriage Unconstitutional?
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This article and the article in this issue by Mark Strasser...
