Facts of the Case
An Alabama law authorized teachers to conduct regular religious prayer services and activities in school classrooms during the school day. Three of Jaffree's children attended public schools in Mobile.
Questions
Did Alabama law violate the First Amendment's Establishment Clause?
Conclusions
-
Yes. The Court determined the constitutionality of Alabama's prayer and meditation statute by applying the secular purpose test, which asked if the state's actual purpose was to endorse or disapprove of religion. The Court held that Alabama's passage of the prayer and meditation statute was not only a deviation from the state's duty to maintain absolute neutrality toward religion, but was an affirmative endorsement of religion. As such, the statute clearly lacked any secular purpose as it sought to establish religion in public schools, thereby violating the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.
After Espinoza, What’s Left of the Establishment Clause?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
When a Pastor’s House Is a Church Home: Why the Parsonage Allowance Is Desirable Under the Establishment Clause
Federalist Society Review, Volume 18
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the parsonage allowance, whereby the value of a...
In Whose Name We Pray: Restoring the Establishment Clause in Town of Greece v. Galloway
Engage Volume 14, Issue 3 October 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is a discussion about the Establishment Clause issue in...
The Great Debate: Attorney General Ed Meese III - July 9, 1985
Speech by Attorney General Edwin Meese III before the American Bar Association on July 9, 1985
? Attorney General Edwin Meese III Before the American Bar Association July 9, 1985, Washington,...