Facts of the Case
In 2018, Steve Elster attempted to register the phrase “TRUMP TOO SMALL” for use on various types of shirts, intending the mark to serve as political commentary on President Donald Trump and his policies. The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) examiner rejected the application, citing two sections of the Lanham Act: Section 2(c), which prohibits registering a mark that identifies a living individual without their consent, and Section 2(a), which bars marks that falsely suggest a connection with living or dead persons. Elster appealed, arguing that the provisions infringed on his First Amendment rights and were not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest. The Board upheld the examiner's decision based solely on Section 2(c), asserting that the statute is constitutional and serves compelling government interests, including the protection of individual rights and consumer protection. Elster appealed the decision, and the Federal Circuit reversed.
Questions
Does the refusal to register a trademark under 15 U.S.C. § 1052(c) when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment?
Understanding Justice Thomas and Justice Barrett’s Fight Over History
It’s unusual to see news articles about disagreements between Supreme Court Justices, especially with phrases...
Understanding Justice Thomas and Justice Barrett’s Fight Over History
It’s unusual to see news articles about disagreements between Supreme Court Justices, especially with phrases...
Courthouse Steps Decision: Vidal v. Elster
What Are Its Implications for Trademark Law and First Amendment Free Speech Protections?
In recent years, the Supreme Court has decided two cases in which it held that...
Courthouse Steps Decision: Vidal v. Elster
What Are Its Implications for Trademark Law and First Amendment Free Speech Protections?
In recent years, the Supreme Court has decided two cases in which it held that...
A Seat at the Sitting - November 2023
The November Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...
A Seat at the Sitting - November 2023
The November Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...
