Facts of the Case
Allan Bakke, a thirty-five-year-old white man, had twice applied for admission to the University of California Medical School at Davis. He was rejected both times. The school reserved sixteen places in each entering class of one hundred for "qualified" minorities, as part of the university's affirmative action program, in an effort to redress longstanding, unfair minority exclusions from the medical profession. Bakke's qualifications (college GPA and test scores) exceeded those of any of the minority students admitted in the two years Bakke's applications were rejected. Bakke contended, first in the California courts, then in the Supreme Court, that he was excluded from admission solely on the basis of race.
Questions
Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, by practicing an affirmative action policy that resulted in the repeated rejection of Bakke's application for admission to its medical school?
Conclusions
-
No and yes. There was no single majority opinion. Four of the justices contended that any racial quota system supported by government violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr., agreed, casting the deciding vote ordering the medical school to admit Bakke. However, in his opinion, Powell argued that the rigid use of racial quotas as employed at the school violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The remaining four justices held that the use of race as a criterion in admissions decisions in higher education was constitutionally permissible. Powell joined that opinion as well, contending that the use of race was permissible as one of several admission criteria. So, the Court managed to minimize white opposition to the goal of equality (by finding for Bakke) while extending gains for racial minorities through affirmative action.
The Landmark Case Of Shaare Tefila v. Cobb
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
A review of Annalise E. Glauz-Todrank, Judging Jewish Identity in the United States (Lexington Books 2023)...
Bostock, The Civil Rights Act, and Affirmative Action
“We’re all textualists now.” That’s what Justice Kagan remarked at the Antonin Scalia Lecture series...
Bostock, The Civil Rights Act, and Affirmative Action
“We’re all textualists now.” That’s what Justice Kagan remarked at the Antonin Scalia Lecture series...
Why Racial Preferences Harm Higher Education
An article of faith among leftists is that we must give preferences to certain “underrepresented”...
Talks with Authors: A Dubious Expediency
Civil Rights Practice Group Teleforum
A Dubious Expediency: How Race Preferences Damage Higher Education is a collection of eight essays written...
The Race Card in ARPA’s Food Supply Deck
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
It is an old aphorism that a prudent person should not watch the making of...
Book Review: A Dubious Expediency: How Race Preferences Damage Higher Education
A Dubious Expediency: How Race Preferences Damage Higher Education, edited by Gail Heriot & Maimon...
Diversity and Elimination of Bias CLE Teleforum: An update to the Harvard Case and the Meaning of Diversity in a Multi-Racial Era
Professional Responsibilities Practice Group Diversity CLE Teleforum
Electronic Sign In: Click Here (Sign-in now!) Written Materials: Click Here Certificate of Attendance: Click Here (Fill in the form...
Diversity and Elimination of Bias CLE Teleforum: The Harvard Case and the Meaning of Diversity in a Multi-Racial Era
Professional Responsibilities & Legal Education Teleforum
*** Please note: CLE is no longer available for this teleforum/podcast.*** Electronic Sign In: Click...
Trump Administration Withdraws Guidance on Affirmative Action In Admissions
On Wednesday, July 3, the Departments of Education and Justice announced that they withdrew a...
Fisher v. UT–Austin and the Future of Racial Preferences in College Admissions
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Fisher v. University...
California’s SCA 5 and Racial Preferences in Education
Engage Volume 16, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This article is about racial preferences in education, specifically in the...
California’s SCA 5 and Racial Preferences in Education
Engage Volume 16, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This article is about racial preferences in education, specifically in the...
Supreme Court Preview: Fisher
An "Honest" Affirmative Action Defense?
In the long running case of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, insufficient notice...
The Kudzu of Civil Rights Law: Disparate Impact Spreads Into Educational “Resource Comparability”
Engage Volume 16, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article is about a Dear Colleague letter from the Department...
A Lady or a Tiger?: Thoughts on Fisher v. University of Texas and the Future of Race Preferences in America
Engage Volume 14, Issue 3 October 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Fisher...
Executive Order 13583: Establishing a Coordinated Government-Wide Initiative to Promote Diversity
Engage Volume 14, Issue 2 July 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is about Executive Order (EO) 13583—Establishing a Coordinated Government-Wide...
Fisher v. University of Texas: Affirmative Action Revisited by the Supreme Court - Podcast
Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast
Fisher v. University of Texas is being heralded as the blockbuster case of this year’s...
School Discipline and Disparate Impact
Engage Volume 13, Issue 1, March 2012
Note from the Editor: This paper analyzes the U.S. Department of Education’s proposed use of...
The Fisher Case: Mismatch & the Future of Affirmative Action - Podcast
Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then...
Affirmative Action: Back to Bakke? - Transcript
The Civil Rights Practice Group sponsored this panel during the 2003 National Lawyers Convention on...
OCR's Testing (Mis)Guidance: Anti-Education, Anti-Civil Rights
Civil Rights Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 3, Issue 3, Winter 2000
The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights ("OCR") has decided to wade into...