Facts of the Case
After the 2020 Census, in which North Carolina gained an additional seat in the U.S. House of Representatives and thus required redistricting of the state, North Carolina’s Republican-majority state legislature passed a partisan gerrymander.
The map was challenged in state court, and in February 2022, the North Carolina Supreme Court struck down the map for violating the state constitution’s “free elections clause” and other provisions. The legislature proposed a second gerrymandered map, so the court ordered a special master to create a map for the 2022 congressional elections. The legislators asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review based on an argument that the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution gives state legislatures alone the authority to regulate federal elections—the so-called Independent State Legislature theory.
Questions
Under the U.S. Constitution, does the state legislative body, independent of any constraints by state courts or other laws, have sole authority to regulate federal elections?
Conclusions
-
The Federal Elections Clause does not vest exclusive and independent authority in state legislatures to set the rules regarding federal elections.
State Court Docket Watch: McLinko v. Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania Supreme Court upholds 2019 law permitting universal mail-in voting
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision to hear arguments in Moore v. Harper has garnered significant...
Supreme Court Denunciations from the Left and Right are Misguided
Since the Supreme Court wrapped up business on June 30, liberals have condemned the just-ended...