Facts of the Case
Between 1980 and 1990, only one of Georgia's ten congressional districts was majority-black. According to the 1990 decennial census, Georgia's black population of 27% entitled blacks to an additional eleventh congressional seat, prompting Georgia's General Assembly to re-draw the state's congressional districts. After the Justice Department refused pre-clearance of several of the Assembly's proposed new districts, the Assembly was finally successful in creating an additional majority-black district through the forming of an eleventh district. This district, however, was called a "geographic monstrosity" because it extended 6,784.2 square miles from Atlanta to the Atlantic Ocean. In short, "the social, political, and economic makeup of the Eleventh District tells a tale of disparity, not community."
Questions
Is racial gerrymandering of the congressional redistricting process a violation of the Equal Protection Clause?
Conclusions
-
Yes. In some instances, a reapportionment plan may be so highly irregular and bizarre in shape that it rationally cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to segregate voters based on race. Applying the rule laid down in Shaw v. Reno requires strict scrutiny whenever race is the "overriding, predominant force" in the redistricting process.
Felon Re-Enfranchisement Requirements Upheld by North Carolina Supreme Court
When lawsuits challenge state legislative enactments as racially discriminatory or motivated by invidious intent, courts...
Timeless Concepts for a Trying Time: The Separation of Powers and Judicial Review
If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men,...
Escaping the Goldilocks Problem: A Proposal That Would Enable States to Avoid Redistricting Litigation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Partisan Gerrymandering and Party Rights: Why Gill v. Whitford Undermines All Future Partisan-Gerrymandering Claims
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Supreme Court’s opinion in Gill v. Whitford...
Overturning Auer Deference
In conjunction with the Supreme Court Clinic at Antonin Scalia Law School, Garco Construction, Inc....
Testimony on “The Voting Rights Act after the Supreme Court’s Decision in Shelby County”
Engage Volume 14, Issue 2 July 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is based on testimony given by the author before...
Tort Reform Update: Recently Enacted Legislative Reforms and State Court Challenges
State Courts White Paper
Introduction Since the 2010 elections altered the makeup of many state legislative and executive...
Declining to Follow Its Neighbor Missouri, the Kansas Supreme Court Holds Noneconomic Damages Cap in Medical Malpractice Cases Constitutional
State Court Docket Watch, Winter 2012-2013
The Kansas Supreme Court, in Miller v. Johnson,1 recently upheld Kansas’ statutory cap on non-economic...
State Court Challenges to Legislatively Enacted Tort Reforms
White Paper
Introduction Over the past three decades, proponents of civil liability reform have made significant gains.1...
The Supreme Court Closes in on Racial Gerrymandering but Questions Remain
Civil Rights Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 1, Fall 1996
A closely divided U.S. Supreme Court has extended the emerging pattern of condemnation of race-based...