Facts of the Case
Ernest Chambers, a member of the Nebraska legislature, challenged the legislature's chaplaincy practice in federal court. This practice involves the offering of a prayer at the beginning of each legislative session by a chaplain chosen by the state and paid out of public funds. The district court supported Chambers on the use of public funds. The appeals court supported Chambers on the prayer practice. Both parties appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Questions
Does the chaplaincy practice of the Nebraska legislature violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment?
Conclusions
-
In a 6-to-3 decision, the Court upheld the chaplaincy practice. In his opinion for the Court, Chief Justice Warren Burger abandoned the three-part test of Lemon v. Kurtzman, which had been the touchstone for cases involving the Establishment Clause. In its place, Burger rested the Court's opinion on historical custom. Prayers by tax-supported legislative chaplains could be traced to the First Continental Congress and to the First Congress that framed the Bill of Rights. As a consequence, the chaplaincy practice had become "part of the fabric of our society." In such circumstances, an invocation for Divine guidance is not an establishment of religion. "It is," wrote Burger, "simply a tolerable acknowledgment of beliefs widely held among the people of this country."
A Cord of Three Strands: How Kennedy v. Bremerton School District Changed Free Exercise, Establishment, and Free Speech Clause Doctrine
Federalist Society Review, Volume 24
In 2015, Bremerton High School football coach Joseph Kennedy lost his job for kneeling at...
The End of Independent Agencies? Restoring Presidential Control of the Executive Branch
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
On the day that President Joe Biden took office, among his first official acts was...
After Espinoza, What’s Left of the Establishment Clause?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Can a New Establishment Clause Jurisprudence Succeed in Protecting Religious Minorities Where Lemon Has Failed?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
The Bladensburg WWI Memorial Cross
Government Expression of Religious Content and the Establishment Clause
On February 27, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in...
When a Pastor’s House Is a Church Home: Why the Parsonage Allowance Is Desirable Under the Establishment Clause
Federalist Society Review, Volume 18
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the parsonage allowance, whereby the value of a...
In Whose Name We Pray: Restoring the Establishment Clause in Town of Greece v. Galloway
Engage Volume 14, Issue 3 October 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is a discussion about the Establishment Clause issue in...
Who Said That?: A Simple Question That May Change the Way Courts View Legislative Prayer
Engage Volume 14, Issue 1 February 2013
Related Opinions & Briefs: • Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Town of Greece v. Galloway:...