Facts of the Case
Dollree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials after an admittedly illegal police search of her home for a fugitive. She appealed her conviction on the basis of freedom of expression.
Questions
Were the confiscated materials protected from seizure by the Fourth Amendment?
Conclusions
-
In an opinion authored by Justice Tom C. Clark, the majority brushed aside First Amendment issues and declared that all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in a state court. The decision launched the Court on a troubled course of determining how and when to apply the exclusionary rule.
Justices Black and Douglas concurred.
Justice Stewart concurred in the judgment but agreed fully with Part I of Justice Harlan's dissent and expressed no view as to the merits of the constitutional issue.
Justice Harlan, joined by Justices Frankfurter and Whittaker, wrote a dissenting opinion.
Textualism in Alabama
Federalist Society Review, Volume 24
Textualism is alive and well in Alabama. This interpretive doctrine teaches that legal texts have...
Principles of State Constitutional Interpretation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
State constitutionalism—the practice of state courts deciding cases on independent state constitutional grounds—is a vital...
Mapp v. Ohio [SCOTUSbrief]
Short video featuring Paul Cassell
When police officers commit an unconstitutional search, should the evidence they obtained be usable in...
Protecting Individual Liberty Through State Constitutional Law: Judge Sutton’s Plea for Federalism in Judicial Decisionmaking
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
A review of 51 Imperfect Solutions: States and the Making of American Constitutional Law, by...
Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Engage Volume 15, Issue 1 February 2014
Note from the Editor: This article is a discussion about the Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby...
The Philosopher in Action: A Tribute to the Honorable Edwin Meese III
Engage Volume 13, Issue 1, March 2012
In December 2011, former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese celebrated his 80th birthday. While his...
The Future of Miranda and the Exclusionary Rule
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 3, Issue 3, Winter 2000
Following are remarks from a panel discussion sponsored by the Criminal Law & Procedure Practice...