Facts of the Case
A Massachusetts law allowed cities to require residents to be vaccinated against smallpox. Cambridge adopted such an ordinance, with some exceptions. Jacobson refused to comply with the requirement and was fined five dollars.
Questions
Did the mandatory vaccination law violate Jacobson's Fourteenth Amendment right to liberty?
Conclusions
-
The Court held that the law was a legitimate exercise of the state's police power to protect the public health and safety of its citizens. Local boards of health determined when mandatory vaccinations were needed, thus making the requirement neither unreasonable nor arbitrarily imposed.
Revisiting Jacobson
In 1905, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Jacobson v. Massachusetts, upholding a state's ability to enforce compulsory...
Jacobson v. Massachusetts Lends Questionable Support to Covid-19 Executive Orders Imposing Criminal Penalties for Non-Compliance
Across the nation, in response to the Covid-19 virus, state and local leaders have issued...
Which Rights Are We Mediating?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
A review of How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights Is Tearing America...
Is Rational Basis the Appropriate Test to Apply in Reviewing Emergency COVID-19 Orders?
In a year in which “quarantine” and “lock-down” have become colloquial terms, the country has...
Jacobson v. Massachusetts [SCOTUSbrief]
Short video featuring Josh Blackman
When a smallpox outbreak swept through the town of Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1903, Rev. Henning...
State Court Docket Watch: Midwest Institute of Health, PLLC v. Governor of Michigan
State Court Docket Watch: 2020 Edition
In the wake of Michigan’s first positive tests for the coronavirus, Governor Gretchen Whitmer declared...
North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission
Engage Volume 15, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society is pleased to present two different perspectives on the North...