Facts of the Case
The State of California tried and convicted Hurtado on an information for murder. An information is a written set of accusations made by a prosecutor. Hurtado maintained that California denied him an indictment by a grand jury. A grand jury indictment is based on majority vote of the grand jurors on presentation by the prosecutor.
Questions
Does a state criminal proceeding based on an information rather than a grand jury indictment violate the 14th Amendment's due process clause?
Conclusions
-
No, this was not a violation of due process. Any legal proceeding that protects liberty and justice is due process. The majority opinion, authored by Matthews, reasoned that the Constitution cannot be locked into static conceptions bound by time and place. The Court also took the position that nothing in the Constitution is superfluous. Since the Fifth Amendment contains both a guarantee of grand jury proceedings and a guarantee of due process, the latter cannot embrace the former.
Against Living Common Goodism
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
Today I want to discuss a new version of an old debate. In 1985, then-Attorney...
Whether There is a Constitutional Right to Die
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2, Spring 1997
The existence of a constitutional right to die is currently under consideration by the United...
