Facts of the Case
A 19-year-old department store worker expressed his opposition to the Vietnam War by wearing a jacket emblazoned with "FUCK THE DRAFT. STOP THE WAR" The young man, Paul Cohen, was charged under a California statute that prohibits "maliciously and willfully disturb[ing] the peace and quiet of any neighborhood or person [by] offensive conduct." Cohen was found guilty and sentenced to 30 days in jail.
Questions
Did California's statute, prohibiting the display of offensive messages such as "Fuck the Draft," violate freedom of expression as protected by the First Amendment?
Conclusions
-
Yes. In an opinion by Justice John Marshall Harlan, the Court reasoned that the expletive, while provocative, was not directed toward anyone; besides, there was no evidence that people in substantial numbers would be provoked into some kind of physical action by the words on his jacket. Harlan recognized that "one man's vulgarity is another's lyric." In doing so, the Court protected two elements of speech: the emotive (the expression of emotion) and the cognitive (the expression of ideas).
Courthouse Steps Decision: Chiles v. Salazar
Chiles v. Salazar addressed whether a Colorado law prohibiting “conversion therapy” violates the First...
Courthouse Steps Decision: TikTok, Inc. v. Garland
In TikTok, Inc. v. Garland, the Court was asked to consider whether the Protecting Americans...
Litigation Update: Chiles v. Salazar
Chiles v. Salazar arises from a challenge to a Colorado law limiting therapists’ speech when...
The First Amendment in Trademark Law after Vidal v. Elster
In Vidal v. Elster (the “Trump Too Small” case), the Supreme Court unanimously upheld a...
303 Creative, Masterpiece Cakeshop, and the Fate of Free Exercise for Wedding Vendors
Over the past decade, the tension between First Amendment rights and public accommodations laws has...
Compelled Speech in Masterpiece Cakeshop: What the Supreme Court’s June 2018 Decisions Tell Us About the Unresolved Questions
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the unresolved compelled-speech questions in Masterpiece Cakeshop v....
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky Strikes Down a Vague Ban on Speech in Polling Places, But Future Bans May Be Upheld
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Supreme Court’s opinion in Minnesota Voters Alliance...
Turning Bad Into Good?
Intellectual Property Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 2, Issue 1, Spring 1998
In The Wife of Bath's Tale, Chaucer observes, "Forbede us thyng, and that desiren we."...
