Michael Williams is the Solicitor General for the State of West Virginia. In that role, Michael represents the State in appeals before state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Michael also coordinates strategic affirmative litigation on the State’s behalf, including litigation against the federal government.
Before joining the Attorney General’s Office, Michael co-led the complex briefing and appeals group at a Michigan boutique firm, representing Fortune 50 companies and others in actions across the country. He also practiced in the litigation groups of two Washington, D.C. firms and clerked with the Appellate Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maine.
Michael’s work has been honored with a Best Brief Award from the National Associationof Attorneys General and a Leader in the Law Award from Michigan Lawyers Weekly. He often speaks and writes on appellate-related issues.
Michael clerked twice in the Fourth Circuit: once with then-Chief Judge Deborah Chasanow of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland and later with Judge G. Steven Agee of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. He attended George Washington University Law School and Bates College.
*****
A person listed on this page has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's bio page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a speaker or author are those of the individual.
The States’ Role in Appellate Litigation: A Conversation Among Solicitors General
Caribbean Cinemas Fine Arts (Banco Popular)PR-25
San Juan, PR
Suncor Energy v. Boulder County: Federalism, Judicial Power, and the Future of Climate Litigation
In Suncor Energy, Inc., v. Commissioners of Boulder County, the Supreme Court will consider whether...
Suncor Energy v. Boulder County: Federalism, Judicial Power, and the Future of Climate Litigation
In Suncor Energy, Inc., v. Commissioners of Boulder County, the Supreme Court will consider whether...
Is the Federal Judicial Center Putting a Thumb on the Scale for A Climate Agenda?
The Federal Judicial Center describes itself as “the research and education agency of the judicial...
Is the Federal Judicial Center Putting a Thumb on the Scale for A Climate Agenda?
The Federal Judicial Center describes itself as “the research and education agency of the judicial...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Trump v. CASA, Inc.
On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order effectively ending birthright citizenship for...