In Bristol Asphalt, Co. v. Rochester Bituminous Products, Inc., the Supreme Judicial Court of...
Contributor Information
Eric Hageman
Counsel, Clare Locke
Biography
Eric Hageman is an attorney at Clare Locke LLP, where he defends individuals, institutions, and corporations from reputational attacks. He has significant litigation experience at all levels of state and federal court, having authored scores of merits and amicus briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court and federal courts of appeals. His clients represent a wide array of industries and have included several high-net-worth individuals and half the Fortune 20.
Before joining Clare Locke, Eric was an appellate attorney in the Washington, D.C., offices of two multinational law firms, where he worked on shareholder disputes, broken-deal litigation, separation-of-powers issues, and arbitrability disputes, as well as litigation under the Foreign Agent Registration Act, the Freedom of Information Act, and the Alien Tort Statute.
Eric was a law clerk to the Honorable Kyle Duncan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and to the Honorable Thomas Schroeder of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.
Eric earned his J.D. from Notre Dame Law School, where he was Executive Editor of the Notre Dame Law Review and published work on the Takings Clause and on the obligations of judicial candor. He earned his Bachelor of Architecture from the University of Notre Dame, where he studied in Rome and was a member of the School of Architecture Curriculum Committee.
Eric is an Antonin Scalia Fellow and a Fellow of the James Wilson Institute on Natural Rights and the American Founding. His legal and jurisprudential scholarship has appeared in the Notre Dame Law Review, U.S. Constitutional Law: Rights & Liberties, Law and Liberty, and Mirror of Justice, among other publications. Eric’s commentary on the Supreme Court has been quoted in Bloomberg.
Supreme Judicial Court Streamlines Massachusetts Anti-SLAPP Motions
Eric Hageman
In Bristol Asphalt, Co. v. Rochester Bituminous Products, Inc., the Supreme Judicial Court of...