Solicitor General of Missouri
Lou Capozzi is the Solicitor General of Missouri. In that role, he oversees all appeals for the State of Missouri. He is also the Director of Special Litigation and litigates high-stakes cases at trial.
Lou previously worked at Jones Day, where he specialized in administrative and election law. At Jones Day, he helped lead a six-week bench trial in federal court, during which he cross-examined important expert and fact witnesses, delivered closing argument, asserted evidentiary objections, and argued several motions, including a motion for a directed verdict. He has also authored briefs at all phases of litigation--from evidentiary motions to dispositive motions and appeals.
Lou is also Lecturer in Law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and a Public Member of the Administrative Conference of the United States. He has published several academic articles focusing on administrative law.
Lou clerked for Justice Neil Gorsuch at the United States Supreme Court in the 2021 Term, as well as for Judges J. Harvie Wilkinson III of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and Anthony Scirica of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. He gradated as the valedictorian from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 2019.
Professor of Law and J. Philip Johnson Faculty Fellow, University of North Dakota School of Law
Michael S. McGinniss is Professor of Law and J. Philip Johnson Faculty Fellow at the University of North Dakota School of Law, where he joined the faculty in 2010 and served as the Dean from 2019 to 2022. He chairs the executive committee for the Federalist Society's Practice Group on Professional Responsibility and Legal Education.
Before entering the legal academy, Professor McGinniss served for twelve years as a Disciplinary Counsel for the Supreme Court of Delaware. He currently teaches courses on Professional Responsibility, Advanced Legal Ethics, Civil Procedure, and Federal Courts. He also serves as Faculty Advisor for the North Dakota Law Review and the UND Law Federalist Society student chapter.
Professor McGinniss’ research and scholarship interests are wide-ranging and include lawyer and judicial ethics, lawyer discipline and regulation of the profession, constitutional law (especially First Amendment, separation of powers, and federalism), and cultural challenges faced by conservatives in the law schools and the legal profession. His most recent law review article, Declaring Independence to Secure Integrity: The Supreme Court Justices' Code of Conduct, was published in the Federalist Society Review. His article Expressing Conscience with Candor: Saint Thomas More and First Freedoms in the Legal Profession, was published in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy.
Professor McGinniss has spoken to Federalist Society lawyer and student chapters across the country about judicial independence and ethics, especially relating to the federal courts and the United States Supreme Court Justices. In addition, he has spoken to several chapters about rising challenges to ideological diversity and targeting of conservative viewpoints in law schools and the legal profession. Although he is very pleased to speak on these and many other topics that may be of interest to lawyer and student chapters, in 2026-2027, he has particular interest in speaking on the topic “Lawyer Discipline as Political ‘Resistance’: Separation of Powers, Federalism, and the Rule of Law,” concerning his work-in-progress on the weaponization of professional disciplinary processes against conservative lawyers for political and ideological purposes.
Major Questions Doctrine feat. Lou Capozzi
Charleston Lawyers Chapter
Charleston, SCTopics
Major Questions About the FTC’s Junk Fee Rule
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is due to vote on the so-called “junk fee” rule by the...
Topics
After Chevron, a New Birth of Deference for the Administrative State?
For decades, the judicial doctrine called “Chevron deference” dominated American administrative law. In the aftermath...
Declaring Independence to Secure Integrity: The Supreme Court Justices' Code of Conduct
Michael S. McGinniss
[T]he judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it...
Topics
Religious Advertising Bans: Has the Time Finally Arrived for Supreme Court Review?
In theory, the First Amendment prevents the government from banning speech based on viewpoint. But...
Topics
The Supreme Court’s Jarkesy Decision Sheds Light on the SEC’s Hidden Advantages
The Supreme Court’s momentous decision in SEC v. Jarkesy provides us with a rare glimpse...
Topics
Jarkesy & the FCC’s ALJ Process
By all accounts, the closing days of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 term resulted in...
Topics
Ohio v. EPA: The Supreme Court Stays the Good Neighbor Rule
On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Ohio v. EPA, in...
Topics
SCOTUS DIGs Idaho Abortion Cases
On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a one-sentence per curiam order in Moyle...
Topics
Diaz v. United States: New Decision on Expert Testimony in Criminal Cases
The Supreme Court recently addressed whether, in a criminal expert case, an expert may render...