Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Panel III: The Judicial Power and Evaluating Judicial Supremacy
Benjamin Beaton, John C. Harrison, Gary Lawson, Jeannie Suk Gersen, Amanda L. Tyler
New presidential administrations start with a flurry of administrative actions. These fresh rules, guidelines, and...
Panel III: The Judicial Power and Evaluating Judicial Supremacy
2024 National Student Symposium
Cambridge, MAShowcase Panel II: Whither Precedent?
Tara Leigh Grove, Randy J. Kozel, Gary Lawson, John O. McGinnis, William H. Pryor
No one maintains that the Court has always and forever been originalist in its orientation....
Showcase Panel II: Whither Precedent?
2023 National Lawyers Convention
Washington, DCThe Labor Law Enigma: Article III, Judicial Power, and the National Labor Relations Board
Alexander T. MacDonald
Axon Enterprises v. FTC[1] wasn’t supposed to be about labor law. In fact, it wasn’t...
Reasonable Minds Can Differ: A Review of the Major Cases
Boston Lawyers Chapter, with Pioneer Legal
Boston, MAChevron—Complicated, Start to Finish
Ronald A. Cass
A Review of Thomas W. Merrill, The Chevron Doctrine: Its Rise and Fall, and the...
Topics
Originalism’s Still Around, No Matter What Adrian Vermeule Says
I was taken aback when I read Adrian Vermeule’s recent Washington Post op-ed, which alleges...
Panel V: Is Originalism Possible? Historical Indeterminacy
Randy E. Barnett, Gary Lawson, Stephen B. Presser, Suzanna Sherry
On April 7-9, 1995, the Federalist Society held its fourteenth annual National Student Symposium at...
Panel V: Is Originalism Possible? Historical Indeterminacy
Randy E. Barnett, Gary Lawson, Stephen B. Presser, Suzanna Sherry
On April 7-9, 1995, the Federalist Society held its fourteenth annual National Student Symposium at...