Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Breakout Panel 4 - Is Humphrey’s Executor Still Relevant?
Jenn L. Mascott, Michael McGinley, Jed Shugerman, Brett Shumate, Stephen Alexander Vaden
Earlier this year Judge Jones and Judge Willett released dueling opinions on the applicability of...
Twelfth Annual Executive Branch Review Conference: Register Now or Join Via Livestream!
This year, we are excited to host the Twelfth Annual Executive Branch Review Conference on Tuesday, April...
Panel III: The Judicial Power and Evaluating Judicial Supremacy
2024 National Student Symposium
Cambridge, MAPanel II: The Executive Power, the Legislative Power, and the Administrative State
2024 National Student Symposium
Cambridge, MAShowcase Panel II: Whither Precedent?
Tara Leigh Grove, Randy J. Kozel, Gary Lawson, John O. McGinnis, William H. Pryor
No one maintains that the Court has always and forever been originalist in its orientation....
Showcase Panel II: Whither Precedent?
2023 National Lawyers Convention
Washington, DCPlenary Session #3 U.S. Department of Education Rulemaking: Hiding Regulatory Elephants in Statutory Mouseholes?
Jennifer C. Braceras, Michael B. Brennan, Christian Corrigan, Lanae Erickson, Farnaz F. Thompson, Jed Shugerman
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Biden v. Nebraska has not ended questions about regulatory...
Plenary Session #3 U.S. Department of Education Rulemaking: Hiding Regulatory Elephants in Statutory Mouseholes?
2023 Education Law & Policy Conference
Washington, DC2023 Education Law & Policy Conference
Co-Sponsored by the Defense of Freedom Institute for Policy Studies
Washington, DCReasonable Minds Can Differ: A Review of the Major Cases
Boston Lawyers Chapter, with Pioneer Legal
Boston, MA