Partner, Boyden Gray PLLC
Jimmy Conde is partner at Boyden Gray PLLC, specializing in energy, environmental, and administrative law, with particular expertise in the Clean Air Act. He has protected clients against agency overreach in cutting-edge and complex legal proceedings, including challenges to EPA, DOE, DOT, and California rules seeking to compel electrification of motor vehicles, the FCC’s universal service fund, Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division rules, and HHS rules interfering with the practice of medicine and sound insurance practices. His written commentary has been published and referenced in the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Examiner, Concurrences (an antitrust publication), and Newsweek, among others.
Mr. Conde began his legal career as an associate with Boyden Gray PLLC. He clerked for Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and Judge David J. Porter in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Environmental Law Attorney, DLA Piper
Garrett Kral is an attorney in DLA Piper’s Washington, DC, office, and a member of the Regulatory and Government Affairs Practice Group. His practice includes regulatory counseling, enforcement defense, and complex civil litigation on matters arising under major federal environmental statutes.
Garrett builds on a strong background in environmental science, a familiarity with technical processes involved in industrial operations, and valuable insights gained by serving in each branch of the federal government. With this experience, he advances the business objectives of Fortune 500 companies while limiting exposure and risk. Garrett is regarded as a strategic advisor to such clients on matters of environmental law and policy.
Partner, Boyden Gray PLLC
Jimmy Conde is partner at Boyden Gray PLLC, specializing in energy, environmental, and administrative law, with particular expertise in the Clean Air Act. He has protected clients against agency overreach in cutting-edge and complex legal proceedings, including challenges to EPA, DOE, DOT, and California rules seeking to compel electrification of motor vehicles, the FCC’s universal service fund, Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division rules, and HHS rules interfering with the practice of medicine and sound insurance practices. His written commentary has been published and referenced in the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Examiner, Concurrences (an antitrust publication), and Newsweek, among others.
Mr. Conde began his legal career as an associate with Boyden Gray PLLC. He clerked for Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and Judge David J. Porter in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Environmental Law Attorney, DLA Piper
Garrett Kral is an attorney in DLA Piper’s Washington, DC, office, and a member of the Regulatory and Government Affairs Practice Group. His practice includes regulatory counseling, enforcement defense, and complex civil litigation on matters arising under major federal environmental statutes.
Garrett builds on a strong background in environmental science, a familiarity with technical processes involved in industrial operations, and valuable insights gained by serving in each branch of the federal government. With this experience, he advances the business objectives of Fortune 500 companies while limiting exposure and risk. Garrett is regarded as a strategic advisor to such clients on matters of environmental law and policy.
Director, Project on Criminal Justice, Cato Institute
Matthew Cavedon is the Director of the Cato Institute’s Project on Criminal Justice. He focuses on reforming plea-driven mass adjudication, ensuring police accountability, and defending constitutional criminal originalism. Cavedon’s scholarship has been published (or is forthcoming in) publications including the Arizona State Law Journal, Cato Supreme Court Review, Seattle University Law Review, and Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy. Formerly a Georgia public defender and fellow at the Institute for Justice, Cavedon has taught law school courses on criminal law and procedure, as well as the First Amendment. Cavedon clerked for a U.S. district court and the Supreme Court of Georgia. He came to Cato following a fellowship at the Emory University Center for the Study of Law and Religion.
Director, Project on Criminal Justice, Cato Institute
Matthew Cavedon is the Director of the Cato Institute’s Project on Criminal Justice. He focuses on reforming plea-driven mass adjudication, ensuring police accountability, and defending constitutional criminal originalism. Cavedon’s scholarship has been published (or is forthcoming in) publications including the Arizona State Law Journal, Cato Supreme Court Review, Seattle University Law Review, and Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy. Formerly a Georgia public defender and fellow at the Institute for Justice, Cavedon has taught law school courses on criminal law and procedure, as well as the First Amendment. Cavedon clerked for a U.S. district court and the Supreme Court of Georgia. He came to Cato following a fellowship at the Emory University Center for the Study of Law and Religion.
Professor of Law, Widener University Commonwealth Law School
Professor of Law, Widener University Commonwealth Law School
Topics
When Silence Counts as Violence: The Supreme Court Decides United States v. Delligatti
In United States v. Delligatti, the Supreme Court faced a question at the intersection of criminal...
Topics
In Bondi v. VanDerStok, the Supreme Court Missed an Opportunity to Rein in Executive Branch Overreach
Last week, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Bondi v. VanDerStok (formerly known as...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Oklahoma v. EPA and EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC
James Conde, Garrett Kral
Venue Selection for Judicial Review of EPA’s Clean Air Act Final Actions: When does EPA get to pick its court?
On March 25th, 2025, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument to resolve two circuit...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Oklahoma v. EPA and EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC
James Conde, Garrett Kral
Venue Selection for Judicial Review of EPA’s Clean Air Act Final Actions: When does EPA get to pick its court?
On March 25th, 2025, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument to resolve two circuit...
Topics
Supreme Court Justices Seem Skeptical of Nondelegation Doctrine Claim in FCC v. Consumers’ Research
On Wednesday, March 26, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Federal Communications...
Courthouse Steps Decision: Delligatti v. United States
Matthew P. Cavedon
Delligatti v. United States concerned whether a crime that requires proof of bodily injury or...
Courthouse Steps Decision: Delligatti v. United States
Matthew P. Cavedon
Delligatti v. United States concerned whether a crime that requires proof of bodily injury or...
Topics
Court Appears Split in Racial-Gerrymandering Case: Arguments Heard in Louisiana v. Callais
Louisiana v. Callais, which was before the Supreme Court for oral argument today, involves an...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Louisiana v. Callais
Michael R. Dimino
Louisiana's congressional districts, which it redrew following the 2020 census, currently sit in a state...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Louisiana v. Callais
Michael R. Dimino
Louisiana's congressional districts, which it redrew following the 2020 census, currently sit in a state...