Senior Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation
Chris Kieser practices in PLF’s property rights and equality before the law practice groups.
His property rights clients include Cedar Point Nursery, which challenged a California regulation requiring them to allow union organizers to invade their private property, as well as Randall and Kimberley Pavlock, who are fighting back against Indiana’s beachfront land grab along Lake Michigan.
Under equality before the law, Chris represents coalitions of Asian-American parents challenging discriminatory admissions policies for selective K-12 schools in New York City; Montgomery County, Maryland; and Fairfax County, Virginia. He also represents a parent organization in Connecticut challenging a racial quota that prevents many Black and Hispanic students from enrolling at the state’s magnet schools.
Chris has published law review articles in the William & Mary Environmental Law Review and the Federalist Society Review. His op-eds have appeared in the New York Daily News, National Review, The Blaze, the Daily Journal, and SCOTUSblog.
Chris clerked for the Honorable Daniel A. Manion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and the Honorable Thomas D. Schroeder of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. He holds a B.A., cum laude, from the University of Notre Dame, and graduated magna cum laude from Notre Dame Law School in 2013. At Notre Dame, he was an articles editor of the Notre Dame Law Review.
Growing up on Long Island, Chris developed a deep passion for limited government and individual liberty, arguing with his more numerous progressive classmates. This experience made him deeply skeptical that government tinkering at the expense of individual rights ever works, whether it be denying a property owner the use of his land or a student a seat at her desired school because of her race. He chose PLF because it is the national leader in litigation that furthers individual liberty.
When he’s not working, you’re likely to find Chris rooting for the Mets and Fighting Irish or debating some arcane point of law (because apparently that doesn’t happen enough at work).
Chris is currently licensed to practice in California and admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States, the United States Courts of Appeal for the Second, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits, and the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Central Districts of California, the Northern District of Indiana, and the Northern District of Illinois.
Vice President, Practice Groups, The Federalist Society
Finding the Denominator in Regulatory Takings Cases: A Preview of Murr v. Wisconsin
Christopher M. Kieser
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This article discusses Murr v. Wisconsin, a regulatory takings case that the...
Topics
Scrutiny for Me, But Not For Thee? New York Times Columnist Praises Courts for "Calling out Legislators" in Abortion and Voting Rights Cases
It is not often that a progressive columnist offers full-throated praise for judicial decisions to...
Fisher v. UT–Austin and the Future of Racial Preferences in College Admissions
Elizabeth Slattery
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Fisher v. University...
Topics
Author Response: More on Judicial Impartiality
I concur wholeheartedly with Evan Bernick’s thesis, written in response to my recent blog, “Trump...
Topics
Judicial Impartiality Must Not Be a Mere "Facade": On the Dangers of Individual and Systematic Judicial Bias
In an article published Tuesday on this blog, David Applegate applauds the New York Times...
Topics
Second Circuit Issues Landmark Decision Regarding Electronic Privacy And The Territorial Scope Of U.S. Law
On July 14, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a...
Topics
Trump Trumps Ginsburg
In an astonishing editorial – astounding because of its source, not its content – entitled...
Topics
A new weapon in the fight against executive branch abuse
Professional commentators have expressed their surprise at the extent to which the national political establishment...
Topics
Stormans, Inc. v. Wiesman: Paging the Free Exercise Clause
The Supreme Court denied certiorari yesterday in Stormans, Inc. v. Wiesman, which could have been...
Topics
Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro et. al. - A Brief Overview
The U.S. Supreme Court recently pushed back against the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) attempt...