New Rule on Union Dues: Knox v. SEIU

 

This week the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Knox v. Service Employees International Union, reversing the Ninth Circuit 7-2. The case concerns a union special assessment for a "Political Fight Back Fund" that nonmember California state employees were required to pay as a condition of employment. The Court held 5-4, in a majority opinion written by Justice Alito, that "when a public sector union imposes a special assessment or dues increase, the union must provide [a notice of the purpose of the assessment or increase] and may not exact any funds from nonmembers without their affirmative consent." The Court also held that the union could not constitutionally charge the nonmembers for its expenses opposing ballot questions even if they "may be said to have an effect on present and future contracts between public-sector workers and their employers." Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ginsburg, concurred in the judgment, but agreed only that "[w]hen a public-sector union imposes a special assessment intended to fund solely political lobbying efforts, the First Amendment requires that the union provide nonmembers an opportunity to opt out of the contribution of funds." Justices Breyer and Kagan dissented. Our experts will discuss the ramifications of the case.

Featuring:

• Mr. Dominic Parella, Hogan Lovells LLP
• Mr. W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation

Call begins at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.