Yaakov Roth's goal is to strategically develop and effectively present the key legal arguments that will secure victory for clients through appellate advocacy and dispositive motions. He has represented clients in high-profile Supreme Court cases, argued appeals in the federal Courts of Appeals, and prepared motions to dismiss and for summary judgment across a range of substantive areas.
Yaakov's most recent Supreme Court experience includes vindicating former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell from political corruption charges, narrowing the geographic scope of private civil RICO lawsuits, and pursuing a major challenge to the Affordable Care Act from inception through high court review. At the appellate level, Yaakov's oral advocacy has included pressing a First Amendment challenge to an Ohio law prohibiting "false" campaign statements, seeking disclosure of a Justice Department policy manual concerning criminal discovery, and protecting the religious freedom rights of Death Row inmates. He has successfully defended his clients against defamation, antitrust, Title VII, and ERISA claims — including nationwide class actions — and pursued a host of challenges to federal, state, and local regulations. His ERISA experience also includes a series of withdrawal liability arbitrations and related litigation.
Yaakov speaks and writes about the Supreme Court and First Amendment issues and maintains an active pro bono practice centered around religious freedom and criminal justice.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
The Major Questions Doctrine: West Virginia v. EPA
National Lawyers Conference 2022
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Ave NW
Washington, DC 20006
The Bane of the Administrative State? The Nondelegation and Major Questions Doctrines After West Virginia v. EPA
DC Young Lawyers Chapter
America's Square300 New Jersey Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001
Litigation Update: Merck et al. v. Becerra et al.
Pharmaceutical company Merck & Co., Inc. (Merck) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of...
Litigation Update: Merck et al. v. Becerra et al.
Pharmaceutical company Merck & Co., Inc. (Merck) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of...
The Major Questions Doctrine: West Virginia v. EPA
National Lawyers Conference 2022
Supreme Court actions during the 2021-2022 term - opinions, grants and denials of petitions for...
The Major Questions Doctrine: West Virginia v. EPA
National Lawyers Conference 2022
Supreme Court actions during the 2021-2022 term - opinions, grants and denials of petitions for...
The Future of Chevron Deference at the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court decided multiple administrative law cases this term, but in no majority opinion...