Stephen J. Cox served as the 39th United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Texas (EDTX). During his tenure as U.S. Attorney, he increased the District’s focus on complex fraud and white-collar enforcement, transnational elder-fraud schemes, and tech-related enforcement, while building out public-private partnerships to promote information sharing and voluntary disclosures. Before being appointed as U.S. Attorney, Cox served as Deputy Associate Attorney General and Chief of Staff within the Department’s Office of the Associate Attorney General. In his role, Cox oversaw numerous litigating components and their civil and criminal enforcement efforts, with particular attention to some of the Department’s most complex healthcare and financial fraud matters. Cox also spearheaded numerous policy reforms relating to corporate enforcement and regulatory reform, and in his capacity as U.S. Attorney, Cox formally adopted over ten of those policy reforms for the Eastern District of Texas.
Previously, Cox served on the William H. Webster Commission on the FBI, Counterterrorism, Intelligence, and the Events of Fort Hood, and as a senior advisor to the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Cox has also spent time in private practice at Apache Corporation and WilmerHale, dealing with white collar investigations, ethics and compliance, commercial transactions, and corporate governance. Cox has a B.S. degree in Computer Science from the Texas A&M University and J.D. degree from the University of Houston Law Center. He is a member of the Texas and District of Columbia.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
After Four Years of Some Self Restraint, Will the Administrative State Leap Back into Aggressive Regulation and Over-Enforcement?
Nashville Lawyers Chapter - Online Event
Zoom WebinarAfter Four Years of Some Self Restraint, Will the Administrative State Leap Back into Aggressive Regulation and Over-Enforcement?
Tyler Lawyers Chapter - Virtual Event
Online EventCOVID-19: How DOJ and HHS Fight Fraud and Protect the Public
Houston and Tyler Lawyers Chapter - Virtual Event
Online EventQuietly Taming the Administrative State—DOJ Initiatives and Results
Locke Lord, LLP600 Travis Street 25th Floor
Houston, TX 77002
Capital Conversations: COVID-19 and FDA; Medical, Legal, and Regulatory Perspectives
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has sought to...
Shining a Light on Regulatory Dark Matter: Regulating Through Guidance
Regulatory Transparency Project Teleforum
For many years, concerns have been raised that the development and use of guidance documents...