Rob Weiner has significant experience as a trial lawyer, appellate advocate, and legal strategist in complex litigation. He is skilled in developing creative legal approaches to bring cases to a quick, cheap and successful resolution. Mr. Weiner’s long experience representing business and sovereign clients in litigation, and his three tours of duty as a government lawyer, have honed his ability to deal with the regulatory, tactical, and constitutional issues arising when the federal government is, or may become, a party in litigation. From 2010-2012, Mr. Weiner was Associate Deputy Attorney General at the US Department of Justice, where his principal responsibility was to oversee the defense of the Affordable Care Act. He also handled sensitive negotiations with a foreign government involving bank secrecy, and dealt with or headed-off difficult issues across the range of the Department’s matters. Mr. Weiner also has served as Senior Counsel in the White House Counsel’s Office, and as an Associate Independent Counsel. He began his career as a law clerk for The Honorable Henry J. Friendly and for Justice Thurgood Marshall.
At the firm, Mr. Weiner has litigated major administrative and constitutional cases; served as national coordinating and trial counsel in product liability and toxic tort cases; represented clients in media-intensive Congressional regulatory, criminal, and disciplinary investigations; and was lead counsel for the State of Israel in litigation involving national security policies. In addition, clients frequently seek him out to author briefs in the US Supreme Court and other forums.
- JD, Yale Law School, 1977
- AB, summa cum laude, Princeton University, 1974
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
A Discussion of ABA Model Rule 8.4(g)
TeleforumRule 8.4(g): A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing? A Debate
New York Law School Student Chapter
Zoom Webinar -- NYLSVia Zoom
New York , NY 10007
Debate: ABA Model Rule 8.4
2017 National Student Symposium
Columbia Law School435 W 116th St
New York, NY 10027
Snow Cancellation - King v. Burwell Debate
SVC 210 Capitol Visitors CenterWashington, District of Columbia 20002
King v. Burwell: U.S. Supreme Court Preview of the Next Challenge to the Affordable Care Act
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group
National Press Club529 14th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20045
A Discussion of ABA Model Rule 8.4(g)
American Bar Association Model Rule 8.4(g) defines professional misconduct in relevant part as “conduct that...
Debate: ABA Model Rule 8.4
2017 National Student Symposium
In August 2016, the American Bar Association (ABA) added new anti-discrimination guidelines for lawyers to...
Debate: ABA Model Rule 8.4
2017 National Student Symposium
In August 2016, the American Bar Association (ABA) added new anti-discrimination guidelines for lawyers to...
King v. Burwell: What are the consequences?
Short video debate with Michael Cannon and Robert Weiner
Michael Cannon, Director of Health Policy Studies at the Cato Institute, and Robert N. Weiner,...
King v. Burwell: What is in dispute?
Short video debate with Michael Cannon and Robert Weiner
Michael Cannon, Director of Health Policy Studies at the Cato Institute, and Robert N. Weiner,...