Oliver Dunford joined the Pacific Legal Foundation in March 2017. He litigates across the country to defend and advance individual liberty and the rule of law. Oliver’s cases involve the separation of powers, economic liberty, property rights, and the First Amendment.
Oliver remains inspired by the Classical Liberal ideals upon which our Founders declared independence and secured the blessings of liberty. The Constitution’s promises, however, are not self-executing. As James Madison explained, “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” Oliver feels lucky that his work helps oblige the government to control itself—to the end that all individuals may pursue their rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Before joining PLF, Oliver clerked at the Ohio Supreme Court and the Ohio Court of Appeals, and spent more than a decade in private practice working on complex commercial litigation. Originally from Cleveland, Oliver is a graduate of the University of Dayton and Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, where he was a managing editor for the Cleveland State Law Review. Oliver is admitted to the state bars of Florida, California, and Ohio, as well as several federal courts including the United States Supreme Court.
Oliver spends all of his free time following the Cleveland Indians.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
Administrative Agency Deference in Ohio after TWISM and Loper Bright
Dayton Lawyers Chapter
Engineers Club of Dayton110 E Monument Ave
Dayton, OH 45402
Deep Dive Episode 181 – State of Emergency? Kentucky’s Legislature vs. Governor
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast
TeleforumGeorgia Supreme Court Rules Certificates of Need Confer Private Rights
In Kennestone Hospital, Inc. v. Emory University, the Supreme Court of Georgia was asked to...
Oral Arguments on the Indian Child Welfare Act
On November 9, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Haaland v. Brackeen and...
Deep Dive Episode 181 – State of Emergency? Kentucky’s Legislature vs. Governor
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast
On June 10, the Kentucky Supreme Court heard a pair of cases to consider whether...
Appointments Clause: Burgess v. FDIC, the Appointments Clause, and the Separation of Powers
Federal Court Docket Watch
Last week, the Fifth Circuit became the third circuit court to consider whether administrative law...
Docket Watch: Burgess v. FDIC, the Appointments Clause, and the Separation of Powers
Last week, the Fifth Circuit became the third circuit court to consider whether administrative law...