Charles I. Francis Professorship in Law, University of Texas at Austin School of Law
Professor Aaron Nielson lectures and writes in the areas of administrative law, civil procedure, and federal courts. Before joining the faculty, he served as Solicitor General of Texas and represented Texas before the U.S. Supreme Court and the Texas Supreme Court, as well as overseeing all appellate litigation for the State. Earlier in his career, he was a professor at Brigham Young University and an appellate and antitrust partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP. He also clerked for Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. of the U.S. Supreme Court, Judge Janice Rogers Brown of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and Judge Jerry E. Smith of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
As Solicitor General, Professor Nielson successfully defended against a First Amendment challenge Texas’s law requiring online pornographers to institute age verification. In 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court appointed him to defend the constitutionality of a federal agency. He currently serves as a Senior Fellow of the Administrative Conference of the United States after completing a six-year term as an appointed public member and chair of the Conference’s Administration & Management Committee.
Nielson’s research focuses on administrative law, federal litigation, and the separation of powers. He has published (or soon will publish) in the Harvard Law Review, Columbia Law Review, University of Chicago Law Review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Duke Law Journal, Georgetown Law Journal, Cornell Law Review, and Northwestern University Law Review, among others. Nielson has been recognized for teaching for teaching and scholarship and in 2021 received the Federalist Society’s Joseph Story Award, which recognizes a young academic for excellence in legal scholarship, a commitment to teaching, and a concern for students, and who has made a significant public impact in a manner that advances the rule of law in a free society. He is also an elected member of the American Law Institute.
Professor Nielson received his J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard Law School and an LL.M from the University of Cambridge, where he focused his studies on the institutions that regulate global competition and commerce. He received his undergraduate degree summa cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania, majoring in economics and political science.
S. Samuel Arsht Professor of Corporate Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School
David Skeel is the Caryl Louise Boies Visiting Professor of Law at New York University, and the S. Samuel Arsht Professor of Corporate Law at the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of The New Financial Deal: Understanding the Dodd-Frank Act and its (Unintended) Consequences (Wiley, 2011); Icarus in the Boardroom: The Fundamental Flaws in Corporate America and Where They Came From (Oxford University Press, 2005); Debt’s Dominion: A History of Bankruptcy Law in America (Princeton University Press, 2001); and numerous articles on bankruptcy, corporate law, financial regulation, Christianity and law, and other topics. Professor Skeel has also written commentaries for the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Books & Culture, The Weekly Standard, and other publications.
Associate Professor, Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Professor Scott joined the Indiana University Maurer School of Law faculty in 2009. He teaches and writes on criminal law and procedure, statutory interpretation, and federal courts. Professor Scott's research examines structural and procedural interactions between the judicial branch and other branches of government, particularly in the criminal context. He has written on efforts to control the composition of the judiciary, including the judicial appointments process, legislative strategies for encouraging judicial retirements, and the semi-retirement program of senior judges. Professor Scott also studies efforts to influence judicial decision making directly by placing constraints on judicial discretion. His current project examines changes in inter-judge sentencing disparity under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, one of Congress's most ambitious efforts to restrict judges in the performance of a historically discretionary function.After graduating from law school, Professor Scott clerked for Judge Michael W. McConnell of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. He then served as a Bristow Fellow in the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States. Before joining the faculty, he worked for two years as an associate in the Supreme Court and appellate practice at O'Melveny & Myers LLP in Washington, D.C.
Topics
Senators Express Bipartisan Interest in Restoring Constitutional Balance of Power
Senators James Lankford (R-OK) and Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) addressed more than 300 policy analysts from government, academia,...
Topics
Hawkes v. Corps of Engineers Teleforum Preview
May the federal government destroy the value of your property and then prevent you from...
Topics
Article: Mandatory Union Fees Survive as U.S. Supreme Court Deadlocks
Bloomberg Politics reports: The U.S. Supreme Court deadlocked in one of its highest profile cases...
Topics
Georgia Governor to Veto Religious Liberty Bill
Governor Deal's veto is not entirely unexpected, but it is no less disappointing for it. Political...
Simmons v. Himmelreich - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Aaron Nielson
SCOTUScast 3-28-16 featuring Aaron Nielson
On March 22, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Simmons v. Himmelreich. This...
Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax-Free Trust - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
David Skeel
SCOTUScast 3-28-16 featuring David Skeel
On March 22, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Puerto Rico v. Franklin...
Voisine v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Ryan Scott
SCOTUScast 3-28-16 featuring Ryan Scott
On February 29, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Voisine v. United States....
Topics
Michael McConnell on Zubik Oral Argument
Professor Michael McConnell's comments on the Zubik v. Burwell (Little Sisters of the Poor) argument are posted...
Topics
Equal Protection for Indian Children
Goldwater Institute Attorney Aditya Dynar and Vice President for Litigation Timothy Sandefur write in the Wall Street...
Topics
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co.
Background Imagine you own a plot of land. You may want to build a house...