Public Health Epidemics - Warning: This Litigation "Cure" Could Kill an Economy
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at info@fedsoc.org.
A recent article in the Financial Times, Drug Industry faces ‘tidal wave’ of litigation over opioid crisis (subscription may be required), notes that officials at every level of government – states, cities and counties – are launching suits against companies that make or distribute opioids seeking a tobacco-style settlement to help deal with the epidemic. Noting that these suits are a harbinger of the quarter of a trillion dollar tobacco settlement, government entities like the District of Columbia are putting out requests for proposals inviting firms to bid for contracts that will generate up to $45 million in contingency fees for the successful bidders.
Firms defending the cases are predicting that this “tidal wave” of suits brought at almost every level of government in almost every state put the odds of a “global settlement” at more than 50/50, adding that “the costs of drug treatment are astronomical and have threatened to bankrupt a lot of counties.” One defense lawyer notes that the contingency arrangement “insulates officials from the financial risk of losing in court.” Another commentator Professor Richard Ausness of the Kentucky College of Law notes that “[o]nce you get a critical mass,” states, cities and counties are bound to join suit hoping to get a piece of the money on the table, “particularly when it doesn’t cost politicians anything.”
Veterans of the tobacco wars will recognize the inflammatory fuel of public outrage at play. A public health epidemic is identified, the deep pocket that manufactures the legal product is targeted for the social costs irrespective of the law or evidence that would hold up in court, state and local politicians enter into alliances brokered by law firms that stand to earn millions, if not billions, from the rush to suit and settlement, and those governments pocket huge streams of money relieving them from budget crises and the need to address decades of government bloat. What gets lost in the fray is that these “made to settle” lawsuits and the lavish money that defendants throw on the table are paid for by…the public at large. In the case of opioids, it will be vastly higher pharmaceutical prices, which can only have a deleterious effect on already out of control health care costs and a struggling economy. The end game of all such suits, known as regulation by litigation, is that punitive, regressive taxes are levied in stealth without representation, by lawyers in exchange for an exorbitant share of the proceeds. Such regulation by litigation is an abuse of the rule of law, taxation without representation and an evasion of democratic accountability.
Senior Litigation Counsel, New Civil Liberties Alliance
Peggy Little, Senior Counsel at New Civil Liberties Alliance, a new public interest law firm challenging the administrative state founded in 2017 by Professor Philip Hamburger, has over three decades of experience as a trial and appellate litigator in complex, high-stakes regulatory, mass-tort, class-action, products liability, securities, commercial and civil rights litigation representing individuals and high-profile litigants including Fortune 50 companies, financial institutions, public companies, and universities in state and federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court.
Peggy is a graduate of Yale College and Yale Law School, where she was awarded the Potter Stewart Prize. She was a law clerk to the Hon. Ralph K. Winter on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Prior to starting her own trial and appellate law firm in 1997, where she was appellate consulting counsel to the New Haven firefighters in Ricci v.DeStefano, a landmark 2009 United States Supreme Court decision, Peggy was a partner at Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn in New Haven, Connecticut. From 2004 to early 2018, Peggy directed, part-time, the Federalist Society Pro Bono Center.
Peggy has participated in many national conferences and symposia addressing issues of current importance in constitutional law – specifically state and federal constitutional questions regarding the separation of powers and the first amendment – and regularly speaks, blogs and publishes on the topic of the unconstitutional exercise of governmental power. In May of 2017, she presented her paper, Pirates at the Parchment Gates, to a conference of state and federal judges at the Law and Economics Center at the Antonin Scalia Law School. Her work has been published by law reviews, legal publications, the Federalist Society, the Wall Street Journal, Law and Liberty and the Manhattan Institute.
Recent publications include: How the SEC silences its critics, The SEC should listen to Sen. Cotton, Lucia v. SEC, Opening Salvos in the Opioid Litigation Wars, Straight Dope on the Opioid Crisis