Facts of the Case
John Angus Smith offered to trade an automatic weapon, a MAC-10, to an undercover officer for cocaine. Subsequently, he was charged with numerous firearm and drug trafficking offenses. Federal law imposes mandatory sentence enhancement penalties, specifically 30 years for a "machinegun", if a defendant "during and in relation to . . . [a] drug trafficking crime[,] uses . . . a firearm." A jury convicted Smith on all counts, which triggered the sentence enhancement. On appeal, Smith argued that the federal penalty for using a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense covers only situations in which the firearm is used as a weapon, not as a medium of exchange. The Court of Appeals disagreed. It held that the plain language of the penalty does not require that a firearm be used as a weapon, but that it applies to any use of a gun that facilitates, in any fashion, the perpetration of a drug offense.
Questions
Does trading a gun for drugs make a convicted defendant eligible for sentence enhancement under a federal law, which requires such treatment if the defendant "during and in relation to . . . [a] drug trafficking crime[,] uses . . . a firearm?"
Conclusions
-
Yes. In a 6-3 decision, authored by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Court ruled that a criminal who trades his or her firearm for drugs "uses" it "during and in relation to . . . [a] drug trafficking crime," which is within the bounds of the sentence enhancement. Justice O'Connor wrote that Congress intended to make the word "use" as broad as possible when it wrote the law. The law does not require proof that a defendant used the gun as a weapon.
Federalist Society Review, Volume 24
PDF The Federalist Society Review is the legal journal of the Federalist Society. The Review is published on the...
Smith v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Brian Kalt
On March 28, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Smith v. United States. At...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument Combo: Smith v. United States & Samia v. United States -Cases on Criminal Law Procedure
In this two-for-one Teleforum, we will cover two cases with questions concerning criminal law and...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument Combo: Smith v. United States & Samia v. United States -Cases on Criminal Law Procedure
In this two-for-one Teleforum, we will cover two cases with questions concerning criminal law and...
A Seat at the Sitting - March 2023
The March Docket in 90 minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...
A Seat at the Sitting - March 2023
The March Docket in 90 minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...
Defending Substantive Due Process on Originalist Grounds
Evan Bernick and Randy Barnett have written a wonderful paper called “No Arbitrary Power: an...
2015 Civil Justice Update
White Paper
This paper recaps key civil justice reforms that occurred in 2015. Part I focuses on...
