Facts of the Case
This case was a challenge to Daugherty's contempt conviction. He failed to appear before a Senate committee investigating the failure of Daugherty's brother (Harry Daugherty, the former Attorney General)to prosecute wrongdoers in the Teapot Dome scandal.
Questions
Was the Senate committee out-of-bounds in issuing its contempt order since the purpose of the investigation had nothing to do with the committee's legislative purpose?
Conclusions
-
The Court upheld Daugherty's contempt conviction, establishing a presumption that congressional investigations have a legislative purpose. This presumption was not overcome by showing that the committee also had another purpose, such as exposure of wrongdoing. This presumption would later restrict the Court's hand in clear cases of congressional overreaching while investigating communists after World War II.
Checking the Executive: The Importance of Congressional Oversight
The Constitution does not explicitly grant Congress the authority to conduct inquiries or investigations of...
Checking the Executive: The Importance of Congressional Oversight
The Constitution does not explicitly grant Congress the authority to conduct inquiries or investigations of...
10 Controversial Fixes to the Regulatory State
Whether legitimacy, democracy, accountability, non-partisanship, or separation of powers motivates the sentiment, there are a...
Constitutional Subpoena Power Transcends Views on Climate Debate
The House Science, Space and Technology Committee, chaired by Lamar Smith, R-TX, recently issued subpoenas...
A Costly Victory for Congress: Executive Privilege after Committee on Oversight and Government Reform v. Lynch
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
“[A] popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a...
Checking the Executive: The Importance of Congressional Oversight
Longworth House Office Building, Committee on Ways and Means, Room 11009 Independence Ave SE
Washington, DC 20515
