Matthew Martens represents clients in their toughest civil and criminal investigations and litigation. He is one of the few lawyers who has appeared—and won—at trial at “all four tables”: civil plaintiff, civil defendant, criminal prosecution, and criminal defendant. In all, he has tried 26 cases ranging from securities fraud to patent infringement to consumer fraud to murder to employment law to money laundering, in New York, California, Illinois, Texas, Florida, Washington, South Dakota, New Jersey, and North Carolina. He has also argued 18 appeals in federal and state appellate courts across the country. Martens joined WilmerHale after a long career of government service, including both as Chief Litigation Counsel for the SEC’s Division of Enforcement and, earlier, as Chief of Staff for the Criminal Division at the US Department of Justice during the Bush Administration. He has been recognized as an AmLaw Daily Litigator of the Week, a National Law Journal Litigation Trailblazer and a Law360 Securities Law MVP.
At the SEC, Martens led the Enforcement Division's litigation program, managing cases nationwide and supervising a trial unit of approximately 40 attorneys in Washington DC, as well as coordinating the activity of litigators throughout the SEC's 11 regional offices. He personally developed and directed the Commission's nationwide litigation response to the Supreme Court's decision in Janus Capital, for which he received the SEC's prestigious Chairman's Award for Excellence.
*****
A person listed on this page has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's bio page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a speaker or author are those of the individual.
Tough on Crime is Not Conservative
Michigan Student Chapter
The University of Michigan Law School625 S. State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
A Conservative Approach to Criminal Justice Reform
North Carolina Student Chapter
UNC School of Law160 Ridge Road
CHAPEL HILL, NC 27514
Government Enforcement in the Financial Sector
Jerome Greene Hall 104New York, New York 10027
Litigation Update: Etienne v. Ferguson
The ongoing case of Etienne v. Ferguson raises profound questions about the interplay between religious...
Litigation Update: Etienne v. Ferguson
The ongoing case of Etienne v. Ferguson raises profound questions about the interplay between religious...
Drive-In Churches and the Constitution: Balancing the Religious Belief in Corporate Worship and Health Concerns Related to COVID-19
Almost every religious institution closed its doors in mid-March in response to requests and then...
Shifting from District Court Action to Administrative Proceedings at the Securities and Exchange Commission - Podcast
Litigation and Corporations, Securities, and Antitrust Practice Groups Podcast
Over the course of the last year, various SEC officials have stated publicly that the...