Jack Lund

Associate, Covington & Burling LLP

Topics:	Administrative Law & Regulation • Affirmative Action • Civil Rights • Constitution • Culture • Due Process • Federalism • Federalist Society • First Amendment • Founding Era & History • Fourteenth Amendment • Labor & Employment Law • Philosophy • Politics • Religious Liberty • Second Amendment • Separation of Powers • Supreme Court • Federalism & Separation of Powers • Free Speech & Election Law • Religious Liberties • Originally Speaking

Topics:

Administrative Law & Regulation • Affirmative Action • Civil Rights • Constitution • Culture • Due Process • Federalism • Federalist Society • First Amendment • Founding Era & History • Fourteenth Amendment • Labor & Employment Law • Philosophy • Politics • Religious Liberty • Second Amendment • Separation of Powers • Supreme Court • Federalism & Separation of Powers • Free Speech & Election Law • Religious Liberties • Originally Speaking

Jack Lund is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office where he is a member of the Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation practice group. Mr. Lund advises clients on all aspects of employee benefits including tax-qualified retirement plans, health and welfare plans, Individual Retirement Arrangements, global incentive plans, executive compensation, ERISA litigation, and corporate transactions. In so doing, Mr. Lund is particularly adept at designing and implementing comprehensive strategies that solve his clients’ most difficult regulatory and legislative problems.

*****

A person listed on this page has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's bio page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a speaker or author are those of the individual.