After graduating from Stanford Law School, where he was Senior Article Editor of the Stanford Law Review, Professor Mikhail joined the law firm of Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett. He then served as a judicial clerk to Judge Rosemary Barkett on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Professor Mikhail's research and teaching are focused on constitutional law, criminal law, torts, international law, jurisprudence, moral and legal philosophy, legal history, and cognitive science. He received his Ph.D. in Philosophy from Cornell University and was a Lecturer and Research Affiliate in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is the author of Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press), along with many articles and essays that have appeared in a wide range of academic journals, such as Stanford Law Review, Virginia Law Review, Georgetown Law Journal, Law and History Review, Ethics, Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, and Psychology of Learning and Motivation.
Professor Mikhail has been a Visiting Scholar at Stanford LawSchool, a Visiting Junior Scholar at the Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies, a Teaching Fellow at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, and a Visiting Professor at the University ofZurich. His research has been featured in Science, Der Spiegel, Boston Review, Prospect Magazine, Discover Magazine, The National Law Journal, and other media outlets. From 2011 to 2013, he served as Associate Dean for International and Transnational Programs. Currently, he is Associate Dean for Research and Academic Programs.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
IV: Resolved: The Federalists Designed a Constitution of Plenary Federal Power (Debate)
2022 National Student Symposium
University of Virginia School of Law580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
The Future of Free Speech in America
Georgetown Student Chapter
Georgetown Law McDonough 141600 New Jersey Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20002
The Relationship Between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
2018 National Student Symposium
Hart Auditorium, Georgetown University Law Center600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
IV: Resolved: The Federalists Designed a Constitution of Plenary Federal Power (Debate)
2022 National Student Symposium
One of the principal disagreements between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists surrounded the role of the...
IV: Resolved: The Federalists Designed a Constitution of Plenary Federal Power (Debate)
2022 National Student Symposium
One of the principal disagreements between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists surrounded the role of the...
The Relationship Between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
2018 National Student Symposium
In 1776, the Continental Congress declared the birth of a new nation. Six of the...
The Relationship Between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
2018 National Student Symposium
In 1776, the Continental Congress declared the birth of a new nation. Six of the...