*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
Gonzales v. Carhart: Its Aftermath and Implications for Abortion Regulation and Jurisprudence
Religous Liberties Practice Group, The American Constitution Society, and The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life
The National Press Club529 14th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20045
Author Response: Interpreting Peruta v. County of San Diego by Joseph Greenlee
Mr. Nichols, I appreciate your response, although I do believe it is misguided.I’ll address each...
Gonzales v. Carhart: Its Aftermath and Implications for Abortion Regulation and Jurisprudence
Religous Liberties Practice Group, The American Constitution Society, and The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life
On April 18, 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act...
Gonzales v. Carhart: Its Aftermath and Implications for Abortion Regulation and Jurisprudence
Religous Liberties Practice Group, The American Constitution Society, and The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life
On April 18, 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act...