580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists: Revisiting the Founding Debates
March 4 — 5, 2022The University of Virginia School of Law Federalist Society Chapter hosted the 41st annual National Student Symposium on March 4-5, 2022. The theme of the Symposium was The Federalists vs. the Anti-Federalists: Revisiting the Founding Debates.
Visit the official Symposium website at
https://www.fedsocsymposium.org/
The Symposium focused on the debates surrounding the ratification of the Constitution to help shed light on the document’s original meaning. Many who study the Founding focus only on The Federalist Papers. Of course, the Federalists “won” in that they supported the eventually ratified Constitution. But the Anti-Federalists were the other half of the story. Their concerns framed the debate. And, although they “lost,” they are responsible for our Bill of Rights. This symposium provided an opportunity to revisit the founding debates and discuss the arguments for and against our Constitution.
The Symposium hosted six debates/panels on significant constitutional issues that we hope will generate serious discussion among students, scholars, and practitioners:
YOUNG LEGAL SCHOLARS PANEL*
*Before the National Student Symposium begins, the Federalist Society's Faculty Division hosted a panel of young legal scholars, presenting prize winning papers with comments from more senior scholars in Brown 102 at the University of Virginia School of Law. For more information, visit https://fedsoc.org/events/2022-young-legal-scholars-panel.
TRAVEL SCHOLARSHIP:
50% TRAVEL SCHOLARSHIP (TRAVEL ONLY—does not include lodging) FOR DUES-PAYING STUDENT MEMBERS.
Click here to JOIN or RENEW your Student Membership ($5)
Back to top*not part of the 2022 National Student Symposium program
Before the National Student Symposium begins, the Federalist Society's Faculty Division will host a panel of young legal scholars, presenting prize winning papers with comments from more senior scholars in Brown 102 at the University of Virginia School of Law. All early arrivals are welcome to sit in and hear some of the exciting scholarship these young legal scholars are working on before the National Student Symposium. For more information, visit https://fedsoc.org/events/2022-young-legal-scholars-panel.
The Federalist Society's Faculty Division hosted a panel of young legal scholars before the National Student Symposium began, presenting prize winning papers with comments from more senior scholars in Brown 102 at the University of Virginia School of Law.
Featuring:
The Irrepressible Myth of Jacobson v. Massachusetts
Election Emergencies: Voting in Times of Pandemic\
Of Statutes and Spirits: Interpretation on the English High Courts, c. 1800-2020
Reconstructing Reconstruction Era Rights
2022 National Student Symposium
Featuring:
2022 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Constitution • Founding Era & History • Philosophy |
---|
Theories of originalism and living constitutionalism currently vie for approval in the courts. Originalists find that popular sovereignty can only come from ratification and legislation. Living constitutionalists fear binding the living by the votes of the dead. What would Jefferson, Madison, or Hamilton think of this debate? Did the founding era public expect the original public meaning to control interpretive debates? Were the American Founders themselves originalists? In a related question, the panel will also explore the usefulness of The Federalist Papers and the Anti-Federalist essays as interpretive tools for identifying the original public meaning of the Bill of Rights. Just how persuasive are the Anti-Federalist concerns considering their position was ultimately lost and the Constitution was ratified? How much did the “losing” arguments contribute to the original public meaning and what light do the founding era debates shed on the proper tools for constitutional interpretation?
Featuring:
2022 National Student Symposium
2022 National Student Symposium
2022 National Student Symposium
2022 National Student Symposium
2022 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Constitution • Federalism • Founding Era & History • Philosophy • Separation of Powers |
---|
There is a folk wisdom that connects the American War of Independence’s “no taxation without representation” with today’s skepticism of Washington, DC and centralized power. The Anti-Federalists were a broad coalition, but most Anti-Federalists shared a dislike of a strong centralized government and believed that many small republics would best protect the individual. Some Anti-Federalists argued that without a bill of rights the Constitution would not be able to sufficiently protect the rights of individuals and the states. Even after ratification, some Founders, such as Jefferson, Mason, and Henry, maintained that the Federalists had in fact “betrayed” the “popular Revolutionary Spirit of ’76” and its desire for “general and individual liberty.” However, once the Jefferson-led Democrat-Republicans—primarily made up of and appealing to the old Anti-Federalist coalition—took office they did not seek to abolish, or significantly alter, this new form of governance. Why not? Did the Anti-Federalists plant the seeds, and prefer to nurture the growth of populism in America?
Featuring:
2022 National Student Symposium
Featuring:
2022 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Constitution • Federal Courts • Federalism • Founding Era & History • Philosophy • State Courts • State Governments |
---|
This panel will center discussion on the role of the states in our constitutional order—by focusing on states’ highest courts and their role in promoting individual rights and the development of the law. The roundtable will also explore the relationship between the state and federal courts, both historical and contemporary, as well as some of the pivotal moments that produced our modern balance of power. The speakers will also suggest ways that judges in each level of government, along with legislators and lawyers, might help improve the balance of power between states and the federal government.
The panelists will discuss the relationship between states and their municipalities. The question of localism was central to the Federalists’ and Anti-Federalists’ debates about the role of government. It was especially significant in respect to the competing interests of agrarian and urban citizens that motivated much ideological conflict in the period. Speakers will discuss how Anti-Federalist preferences for localism and Federalist preferences for nationalization helped produce our modern balance of governmental powers and legal culture. The roundtable will debate whether they see a return to localism soon and, if so, what implications this might have for constitutional governance.
Featuring:
2022 National Student Symposium
Featuring:
2022 National Student Symposium
Featuring:
2022 National Student Symposium
2022 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Constitution • Federalism • Founding Era & History |
---|
One of the principal disagreements between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists surrounded the role of the new Constitution in relation to state authority.
Federalists argued that the Constitution would make the federal Constitution plenary only in certain areas while preserving the role of the states. The Anti-Federalists feared that the federal Constitution would result in a nationalized government where states would play no role and the federal government would overwhelm any semblance of state authority. Panelists will debate what the Federalists meant when they argued for a plenary, but limited federal Constitution, the different views they held, and whether the Federalists or Anti-Federalists were correct.
Featuring:
Madison and the Fight for the Constitution
Stay seated and join us during the break for a special screening of the new FedSoc Films short documentary: Madison and the Fight for the Constitution. Discover the story of James Madison, the Founding Father who gave us the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Learn how he wrote a new nation into existence and unified the people behind ideals that would change the course of history in this new FedSoc Films short documentary.
2022 National Student Symposium
2022 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Constitution • Federalism • Founding Era & History • Separation of Powers |
---|
In the contemporary debates over the nature of executive power, two ideas are perennially prominent and intractably controversial: the unitary executive theory and nondelegation doctrine. While many prominent lawyers and judges have advocated a unitary model of the executive, it is still controversial whether the Constitution requires that the President sit at the top of the executive pyramid. And while the Court has refused to seriously revitalize the nondelegation doctrine in recent cases, voices on and off the bench persist in calling for limits on the executive’s ability to exercise lawmaking power.
While these debates have modern salience, they actually predate the Constitution. Which provokes the question: what did the Federalists and Anti-Federalists have to say about these topics? In what ways were their debates different from ours, and in what ways are things the same? How do their discussions shed light on our modern arguments? These questions and more will be explored by our learned panelists.
Featuring:
2022 National Student Symposium
2022 National Student Symposium
2022 National Student Symposium
On March 4-5, 2022, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the University of Virginia School of Law hosted the 2022 National Student Symposium. At the symposium's conclusion, Jessica Mann and Prof. Lilian R. BeVier led a toast celebrating the Federalist Society's 40th year.
Featuring:
2022 National Student Symposium
On March 4-5, 2022, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the University of Virginia School of Law hosted the 2022 National Student Symposium.
The Joseph Story Award is named for Joseph Story, who was appointed to the Supreme Court at the age of 32, served as the first Dane Professor of Law at Harvard, and wrote the Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. It is the successor to the Paul M. Bator Award.
Starting in 2018, the Joseph Story Award is given annually to a young academic (tenure-track for 10 years or less or 40 years of age or fewer) who has demonstrated excellence in legal scholarship, a commitment to teaching, a concern for students, and who has made a significant public impact in a manner that advances the rule of law in a free society. This year, the award was presented to Professor Chris Walker.
Featuring:
2022 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Constitution • Founding Era & History • Philosophy |
---|
Many originalists are well-versed in The Federalist Papers. They rely on these documents to better understand the original meaning of the Constitution. But to understand the original meaning of the Constitution, originalists cannot read The Federalist Papers alone. Rather originalists must look to both sides of the original debates. The Anti-Federalists are half of the story, and, when it comes to the Bill of Rights, they may be almost the whole story. The Symposium will begin with an introduction into the Anti-Federalists—who they were, why they were called “Anti-Federalists,” and why originalists should read their essays today.
Featuring: