625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
The People and the Courts
March 7 — 8, 2008On November 7, 2006, Michigan voters strongly embraced the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (“MCRI”), a ballot initiative that amended the Michigan constitution to prohibit the state from granting preferential treatment based on race or sex in public contracting, employment, or education. The proposal, which passed with 58% of the vote, effectively repudiated the Supreme Court’s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), which upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race as a criterion in admissions. Grutter spawned significant controversy both in Michigan and throughout the country, and the success of the MCRI created a controversial blueprint for “overturning” unpopular judicial decisions.
What role “We the People” retain in our constitutional order is not just a question for academics; the increasing number of popular referenda and ballot initiatives addressed to voters on election day has made it a debate with real consequences. The breadth of that debate is not limited to affirmative action, though that remains a lively issue. “The People” may also play a role in circumscribing a state’s powers of eminent domain and deciding just who has the right to marry.
Perhaps more importantly, the way ordinary people live their lives might help give meaning to our law. Because our legal system often takes its cue from tradition, it is critical to decide just when a judge should defer to customary practice—both when interpreting the Constitution, and when fashioning the rules of private law that govern our most ordinary interactions.
The University of Michigan Law School and its Federalist Society chapter are honored to host the 2008 Student Symposium. Our society has long been interested in questions related to “the People and the Courts,” and we are thrilled to expand this discussion to students from coast to coast. Anyone who has attended past Federalist Society Symposia knows to expect the highest degree of respectful and cordial debate. We hope that each of you will approach our panels with insightful questions and will debate with each other what you learn over the course of the weekend. Thank you for joining us.
–Symposium Committee, University of Michigan Federalist Society
Back to top2008 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Culture • Federal Courts • Federalism • Politics • Religious Liberty • State Courts • Supreme Court • Federalism & Separation of Powers • Religious Liberties |
---|
The Federalist Society's Student Division presented this panel at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium on March 7, 2008.
Welcome and Introduction
Panel I: Judicial Interference With Community Values
2008 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Constitution • Election Law • Federal Courts • Founding Era & History • Philosophy • State Courts • Free Speech & Election Law |
---|
The Federalist Society's Student Division presented this debate at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium on March 7, 2008.
2008 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Civil Rights • Constitution • Federal Courts • Property Law • Religious Liberty • Separation of Powers • Supreme Court • Federalism & Separation of Powers • Environmental Law & Property Rights • Religious Liberties |
---|
The Federalist Society's Student Division presented this panel at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium on March 8, 2008.
2008 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Constitution • Culture • Federal Courts • Law & Economics • Politics • State Courts • Supreme Court |
---|
The Federalist Society's Student Division presented this panel at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium on March 8, 2008.
2008 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Constitution • Culture • Founding Era & History • Philosophy • Politics • State Courts |
---|
The Federalist Society's Student Division presented this speech and commentary at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium on March 8, 2008.
2008 Annual Student Symposium
Topics: | Constitution • Culture • Founding Era & History • Philosophy • Religious Liberty • Religious Liberties |
---|
The Federalist Society's Student Division presented this panel at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium on March 8, 2008.
2008 National Student Symposium
The 2008 Paul M. Bator Award was awarded to Prof. Saikrishna Prakash of the University of San Diego School of Law on March 8, 2008, at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium held at the University of Michigan Law School.
2008 National Student Symposium
Topics: | Constitution • Federal Courts • Jurisprudence |
---|
Judge Janice Rogers Brown of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia delivered the Keynote Address at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium Banquet on March 8, 2008.