811 7th Avenue
New York, NY 10019
18th Annual Faculty Conference
January 8 — 9, 2016The 18th Annual Federalist Society Faculty Conference was held on January 8-9, 2016 at the Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel, the co-lead hotel for the AALS Annual Meeting, and all events and speakers were cross-listed in the AALS Annual Meeting Program.
The conference featured panels on the new skeptics of Chevron deference, upward redistribution and rent seeking, and the legal impact of American multiculturalism. The annual luncheon debate considered whether the FCC has authority to implement net neutrality.
Back to top18th Annual Faculty Conference
Topics: | Administrative Law & Regulation • Separation of Powers • Supreme Court • Federalism & Separation of Powers |
---|
When Chevron was first decided it was generally welcomed on the right side of the political spectrum as a principled method constraining judicial discretion and permitting the executive to exert policy control over the administrative state. But as the administrative state continues to grow, some now see Chevron as removing an important check on government power and an abdication of the judiciary’s authority to say what the law is. Some members of the Supreme Court are now open to reconsidering judicial deference to agency action, at least in certain areas, such as determining their own jurisdictions and interpreting their own regulations. The panel will consider the extent to which the new skepticism toward Chevron in particular and judicial deference to agencies in general is justified.
This panel took place during the 18th Annual Faculty Conference at the Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel in New York, NY on January 8, 2016.
Welcome
Panel: The New Chevron Skeptics
18th Annual Faculty Conference
18th Annual Faculty Conference
18th Annual Faculty Conference
Topics: | Administrative Law & Regulation • First Amendment • Separation of Powers • Telecommunications & Electronic Media |
---|
The FCC derives its legal authority almost entirely from statutes that predate the Internet--primarily from the 1934 Communications Act, which was designed for the regulation of a national telephone monopolist, and the 1996 Telecommunications Act, which was designed to incrementally deregulate the communications industry as the vestiges of that national monopoly gave way to competition. Over the past 20 years, the Internet has become the foundation of the communications industry, playing a role similar to that of the monopoly-provided telecommunications services that the FCC has traditionally regulated. There is unquestionably more competition today than there was in 1934, but perhaps not as much as was hoped in 1996. The FCC’s Open Internet Order, in which the FCC brought Internet Service Providers within the regulatory framework initially created in 1934, presents a compelling example of an agency struggling to find a new role in a changed industry – struggling to imbue old statutes with broad grants of power to govern what the FCC, but perhaps not Congress, believes are issues properly within its ambit. In doing so, the Order thrusts the FCC into current debates about the scope of the administrative state, the potential revival of the major questions doctrine, and the potential demise of Chevron. Framed by these issues, this debate will consider whether the FCC’s Open Internet Order fits within the agency’s statutory authority.
This debate took place during the 18th Annual Faculty Conference at the Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel in New York, NY on January 8, 2016.
Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The FCC does not have the legal authority to implement net neutrality
18th Annual Faculty Conference
Topics: | Civil Rights • Constitution • Federal Courts • Federalism • Litigation • Federalism & Separation of Powers |
---|
This panel was part of the 18th Annual Federalist Society Faculty Conference held on January 8, 2016 at the Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel New York, NY.
Young Legal Scholars Paper Presentations
18th Annual Faculty Conference
Topics: | Financial Services • Law & Economics • Administrative Law & Regulation |
---|
This panel will consider to what extent the disproportionate increase in income among the very wealthy is due not to market forces but to rent seeking and government policies that are the product of rent seeking. It will also discuss possible solutions.
This panel took place during the 18th Annual Faculty Conference at the Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel in New York, NY on January 8, 2016.
Panel: Upward Redistribution, Government Policy, and Rent Seeking
18th Annual Faculty Conference
Topics: | Civil Rights • Constitution • Culture • Federalism • First Amendment • Founding Era & History • Politics • Property Law |
---|
Since before the Revolution, American legal and political traditions have supported many forms of multiculturalism, through institutions such as freedom of association, religious liberty, parental rights, freedom of speech, private property, federalism, often open immigration policy, and the like. And those traditions have likewise imposed constraints on such multiculturalism. What can those traditions tell us about today’s multiculturalism debates?
This panel took place during the 18th Annual Faculty Conference at the Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel in New York, NY on January 9, 2016.
Panel: American Multiculturalism: Its Force and Limits From 1776 to Today
18th Annual Faculty Conference
18th Annual Faculty Conference